On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 06:48:58AM +, Aurelio Turco wrote:
> I have looked around for a screen lock
> for the text mode virtual terminal
> that activates automatically after
> a certain amount of idle time
> but could not find even one.
>
> Does anyone know of any?
vlock does the locking part
I have looked around for a screen lock
for the text mode virtual terminal
that activates automatically after
a certain amount of idle time
but could not find even one.
Does anyone know of any?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
I'm not quite sure if I follow what is happening.
So, what is the problem ?
I presume you are installing debsig-verify
within chroot.
And is the problem that debsig-verify is being ran in an unpacked but not
yet configured state, or is it something else ?
> Turns out I wasn't imagining
Hi,
I'm not quite sure if I follow what is happening.
So, what is the problem ?
I presume you are installing debsig-verify
within chroot.
And is the problem that debsig-verify is being ran in an unpacked but not
yet configured state, or is it something else ?
> Turns out I wasn't imagining
_
Hotmail: your free e-mail ! http://www.msn.be/hotmail
Actually, the previous post's usage of netmask would
probably do the trick:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ netmask -c 1.2.3.1:1.2.3.4
1.2.3.1/32
1.2.3.2/31
1.2.3.4/32
so, e.g.:
for hostmask in `netmask -c 1.2.3.1:1.2.3.4`; do
iptables -A INPUT -s $hostmask -d `ifconfig eth0 |
grep
> It would be useful to have something that would take
> an IP address range and return the minimum coverage
> CIDR for that block (for use in feeding to iptables).
>
> For example, if I want to allow access for hosts
> 1.2.3.1 - 1.2.3.4, I currently can allow them
> individually or just allow the
_
Hotmail: your free e-mail ! http://www.msn.be/hotmail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, the previous post's usage of netmask would
probably do the trick:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ netmask -c 1.2.3.1:1.2.3.4
1.2.3.1/32
1.2.3.2/31
1.2.3.4/32
so, e.g.:
for hostmask in `netmask -c 1.2.3.1:1.2.3.4`; do
iptables -A INPUT -s $hostmask -d `ifconfig eth0 |
grep
Turns out I wasn't imagining things. It looks like when
my package list loads debsig-verify it kills the default
file and that's where the trouble starts.
Selecting previously deselected package debsig-verify.
Unpacking debsig-verify (from .../debsig-verify_0.6_i386.deb) ...
Authenticating /va
> It would be useful to have something that would take
> an IP address range and return the minimum coverage
> CIDR for that block (for use in feeding to iptables).
>
> For example, if I want to allow access for hosts
> 1.2.3.1 - 1.2.3.4, I currently can allow them
> individually or just allow the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:26:35AM +, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm working in a pbuilder env btw (rather at home with
> it since I wrote the hooks part). But bottom line is
> it's just a chroot'd shell.
Never mind. You were right. The dpkg.cfg I found was
in the wrong path. Discovered that with an s
Turns out I wasn't imagining things. It looks like when
my package list loads debsig-verify it kills the default
file and that's where the trouble starts.
Selecting previously deselected package debsig-verify.
Unpacking debsig-verify (from .../debsig-verify_0.6_i386.deb) ...
Authenticating /va
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:26:35AM +, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm working in a pbuilder env btw (rather at home with
> it since I wrote the hooks part). But bottom line is
> it's just a chroot'd shell.
Never mind. You were right. The dpkg.cfg I found was
in the wrong path. Discovered that with an s
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:12:56PM +1300, thing wrote:
> It really depends on how careful the lawyers want to be v how little
> effort they want to put in. I will have to write a brief I suspect
> laying out the options.
It will be the secretaries and lowlies who do any real data
entry.
> Is
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:12:56PM +1300, thing wrote:
> It really depends on how careful the lawyers want to be v how little
> effort they want to put in. I will have to write a brief I suspect
> laying out the options.
It will be the secretaries and lowlies who do any real data
entry.
> Is
unsubscribe
> --- --{Inet} -
> and win client after such proceess could work with any TCP/IP Services.
> Some kind of pptp via http $-).
Yes, debian includes "htc" "hts" programs in some kind of package(s) --
httptunnel programs... I expect you will find the 'htc' works on windoze
under CYGWIN --
It would be useful to have something that would take
an IP address range and return the minimum coverage
CIDR for that block (for use in feeding to iptables).
For those addicted to command line (gipsc needs gnome), try netmask :
#netmask -c 192.168.10.224:192.168.10.255
192.168.10.224/27
#netm
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --- --{Inet} -
> and win client after such proceess could work with any TCP/IP Services.
> Some kind of pptp via http $-).
Yes, debian includes "htc" "hts" programs in some kind of package(s) --
httptunnel programs... I expect you will find the 'htc' works on windoze
under CYGWIN --
It would be useful to have something that would take
an IP address range and return the minimum coverage
CIDR for that block (for use in feeding to iptables).
For those addicted to command line (gipsc needs gnome), try netmask :
#netmask -c 192.168.10.224:192.168.10.255
192.168.10.224/27
#netmask
22 matches
Mail list logo
