On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.linuxguruz.org/iptables/
I've found that shorewall (now apt-gettable) makes a very nice iptables
framework/wrapper.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.linuxguruz.org/iptables/
I've found that shorewall (now apt-gettable) makes a very nice iptables
framework/wrapper.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)
ut this subject.
Google ttysnoop.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ut this subject.
Google ttysnoop.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
eeing is exim mail chewing up resources and not letting anything
> else play, like apache. ;o)
Install the eximon package. Run it as root and then use that to
investigate what messages are being held and why.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my meta
eeing is exim mail chewing up resources and not letting anything
> else play, like apache. ;o)
Install the eximon package. Run it as root and then use that to
investigate what messages are being held and why.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my meta
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:23:02 -0500
Dave Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, I know, use what you feel comfortable with, but how
> comfortable are you guys with Exim? -A. Dave
Very. I like, and use both Exim and Postfix in deployed production
systems.
--
related
> know-how to run a secure and stable mailserver on my network.
There's been quite a bit of this sort of data on the Mailman lists
from Chuq von Rospach, myself, Nigel Metherington, and others.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:23:02 -0500
Dave Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, I know, use what you feel comfortable with, but how
> comfortable are you guys with Exim? -A. Dave
Very. I like, and use both Exim and Postfix in deployed production
systems.
--
related
> know-how to run a secure and stable mailserver on my network.
There's been quite a bit of this sort of data on the Mailman lists
from Chuq von Rospach, myself, Nigel Metherington, and others.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my
N
packages seem to work.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
eS/WAN
packages seem to work.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
ports on the ppp0 have I to open, that the local
> php-scripts can connect to the database ???
None.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.ka
hat ports on the ppp0 have I to open, that the local
> php-scripts can connect to the database ???
None.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/
On 17 Dec 2001 14:34:12 +1100
Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so assuming that dpkg (and/or apt?) can deal with embedded gpg
> signiatures in .deb files, how do we get maintainers to start
> using them?
File bugs?
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)
On 17 Dec 2001 14:34:12 +1100
Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so assuming that dpkg (and/or apt?) can deal with embedded gpg
> signiatures in .deb files, how do we get maintainers to start
> using them?
File bugs?
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)
patch accepted?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2001/debian-dpkg-200103/msg00024.html
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
patch accepted?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2001/debian-dpkg-200103/msg00024.html
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:25:36 -0600
Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 12:01:32PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Mail-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
>> unsupported header.
> The guy is using mutt. mutt supports M-F-T. You fig
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:25:36 -0600
Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 12:01:32PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Mail-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
>> unsupported header.
> The guy is using mutt. mutt supports M-F-T. You fig
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:00:58 -0800
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
>> Mail-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
>> unsupported header.
> So are "please" and "thank you,&
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:00:58 -0800
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
>> Mail-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
>> unsupported header.
> So are "please" and "thank you,&
a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
unsupported header.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
unsupported header.
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
GNU/Emacs crap
from my .xemacs, and now, amazingly, finally have the damn thing
under 250K.
> better still, use mutt which has all the support in
> there.
Mutt can't handle MH folders properly (named sequence support to
name but one). No thanks.
--
J C Lawrence
GNU/Emacs crap
from my .xemacs, and now, amazingly, finally have the damn thing
under 250K.
> better still, use mutt which has all the support in
> there.
Mutt can't handle MH folders properly (named sequence support to
name but one). No thanks.
--
J C Lawrence
rs and his commentary (Marcus Ranum's AFTPd is also rather nice
for pure anonymous work).
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows
rs and his commentary (Marcus Ranum's AFTPd is also rather nice
for pure anonymous work).
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfello
On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:40:54 -0700
Eric N Valor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 53-UDP (DNS, if you have bind running)
DNS will talk TCP on port 53 if the record requested is particularly
large.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL
On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:40:54 -0700
Eric N Valor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 53-UDP (DNS, if you have bind running)
DNS will talk TCP on port 53 if the record requested is particularly
large.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL
c) How to harden a system.
d) How to audit and monitor a system.
e) How to actively maintain a secure system.
Choice of Linux distribution or kernel version really isn't going to
help you much there (minor exceptions)..
--
J C Lawrence
c) How to harden a system.
d) How to audit and monitor a system.
e) How to actively maintain a secure system.
Choice of Linux distribution or kernel version really isn't going to
help you much there (minor exceptions)..
--
J C Lawrence
mes as
needed. Here I keep a stock of comparitive Woddy installs on
various media types (IDE/SCSI/installation types) for just that
purpose.
Got a new desktop? Got a new web server? Got a new test box?
What sort of drive? Grab a matching disk off the shelf and one
`dd`
mes as
needed. Here I keep a stock of comparitive Woddy installs on
various media types (IDE/SCSI/installation types) for just that
purpose.
Got a new desktop? Got a new web server? Got a new test box?
What sort of drive? Grab a matching disk off the shelf and one
`dd`
n when i
> configure exim in "satellite" mode, it still keeps port 25 open.
Do a web search for SSMTP -- it does exactly this.
Note that a number of mail applications deliver mail directly to
localhost via SMTP (eg MH) and that use of something like SSMTP will
rep
n when i
> configure exim in "satellite" mode, it still keeps port 25 open.
Do a web search for SSMTP -- it does exactly this.
Note that a number of mail applications deliver mail directly to
localhost via SMTP (eg MH) and that use of something like SSMTP will
rep
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:37:39 +0100
keatch it <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) IDS246 - MISC - Large ICMP Packet: xxx.xx.xx.xx -> home_net
...
> What kind of game is it?. It's a AIX features (the OS that the
> host claims to run)?
Typically with AIX this is an MTU di
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:37:39 +0100
keatch it <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) IDS246 - MISC - Large ICMP Packet: xxx.xx.xx.xx -> home_net
...
> What kind of game is it?. It's a AIX features (the OS that the
> host claims to run)?
Typically with AIX this is an MTU di
on servers are
bad. X client libraries are not so bad.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(*): http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
on servers are
bad. X client libraries are not so bad.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(*): http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:12:34 -0500 (EST)
Patrick Maheral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't there a provision in American (or Canadian) law that allows
> reverse engineering (not disassembling code) for interoperability
> purposes?
Tell that to the DMCA, DeCSS, and the EF
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:12:34 -0500 (EST)
Patrick Maheral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't there a provision in American (or Canadian) law that allows
> reverse engineering (not disassembling code) for interoperability
> purposes?
Tell that to the DMCA, DeCSS, and the EF
a nice idea, and damned useful, much like their describe tools
(gives a full hardware and OS status report).
--
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(*) Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/Keys etc:
in. Very little of the
security game is built on particular application specifics. A whole
lot is built on patterns and behaviour.
--
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--(*) Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=| A man is as sane as
44 matches
Mail list logo
