Re: Bug#798979: [SECURITY] [DSA 3359-1] virtualbox security update

2015-09-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
top virtualbox" and check that no "VBoxSVC" is running. > > > (and sorry for the bad experience you had) > > > cheers, > > Gianfranco > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#794466: Virtualbox might not be suitable for Stretch

2015-08-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ct's stand is on VBox ? From what I've checked so far, Fedora does not ship VBox. But I'm not sure what their reasons are... -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#794466: Virtualbox might not be suitable for Stretch

2015-08-09 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ve been regressions. But if the security team can agree up with this release model, then the VBox team could just keep it up-to-date. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Fwd: Problem with multiple root-users (UID=0)

2011-11-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
course. I did not > investigate the code in statics.c further, whether it plays a role or > not, since a change to mgmt_ipc.c solves my problem. > > Is there a chance to fix this issue just by checking if the user has > sufficient rights, e.g. has uid=0, or is there any special reason for > demanding a user named root? > > Thanks a lot > Thomas > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature