Adam,
Adding libdns58 and libisc50 solved the problem. Here is the dselect
output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED
libdns55 libisc52
The following NEW packages will be installed
libdns58 libis
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 14:07 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> I used dselect to do the bind libs updates. The dependency mismatch
> was handled by dselect, and I had to approve what appeared a downgrade
> to libisc/dns.
I'm guessing this was the package name change from libisc52 to libisc50;
largely
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 14:07, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 13:57, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 18:34 -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
>>>
>>> Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
>>> none seen. So I'm updatin
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 13:57, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 18:34 -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
>>
>> Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
>> none seen. So I'm updating another machine, here is what "dselect" is
>> showing me:
>
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 18:34 -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
>
> Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
> none seen. So I'm updating another machine, here is what "dselect" is
> showing me:
What that output doesn't include, which it should, is that
On 12/30/2010 01:40 PM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
>
> Are you saying that dselect is no longer usefull on doing security
> upgrades? I've been using dselect for over 15 years doing just that. The
> only time I've used aptitude is for doing major version upgrades. If there
> is a problem
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
On 12/29/2010 03:34 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED
bind9 bind9-host bind9utils dnsutils libbind9-50
On 12/29/2010 03:34 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED
> bind9 bind9-host bind9utils dnsutils libbind9-50 libisccfg50
> The following packages will be upgr
Well I waited to see if someone came our with a solution to this problem,
none seen. So I'm updating another machine, here is what "dselect" is
showing me:
*** Req adminbase-files 5lenny7 5lenny8 Debian base system
miscellaneous files
*** Req admindpkg 1.14.29+b
Le lundi 13 décembre 2010 à 08:29 -0800, Account for Debian group mail a
écrit :
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > * Debian security:
> >
> >> Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
> >> which correct the bugs?
> >
> > There was a technical issue wi
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Account for Debian group mail:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, whi
* Account for Debian group mail:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Debian security:
>>
>>> Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
>>> which correct the bugs?
>>
>> There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
>> resolved now.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Debian security:
Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
resolved now. Updates will be released in due course.
Hello,
I
* Debian security:
> Is there any plan to upgrade the bind version in debian to 9.6-ESV-R3
> which correct the bugs?
There was a technical issue with the update process, which has been
resolved now. Updates will be released in due course.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@li
On 02/12/10 14:09 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2010-3613
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2010-3614
This is the first I've heard of these issues. You can submit a bug
report against bind9 to encourage the maintainer to start wo
On 2010-12-02, Debian security wrote:
>
> --=-PKfS7p5OBjSN/MdjuBqP
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hello,
>
> ISC published new versions of their DNS server: bind.
> This version is corrects bug and one security issue (classified as Hig
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:34:40 -1000, Debian security wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ISC published new versions of their DNS server: bind.
> This version is corrects bug and one security issue (classified as High)
> that impacts the version shipped in Debian Lenny.
> It has been published yeterday and I still
Hello,
ISC published new versions of their DNS server: bind.
This version is corrects bug and one security issue (classified as High)
that impacts the version shipped in Debian Lenny.
It has been published yeterday and I still can't see any update in the
security repository.
Is there any plan to u
18 matches
Mail list logo
