I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
machine and send your mail back along the same connection, as if the server
were
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:49:53AM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
> server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110 is closed for external
> interface, so I can't get my emai
Hi all.
I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110 is closed for external
interface, so I can't get my email messages with pop3 clients.
Is there any way to tunnel pop3 over ssh? How?
I'm using that with
On Jul 30, 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> An easier way would be to use the autocmd feature of vim. I use it for
> example this way:
>
> |autocmd BufNewFile,BufReadPost reportbug*,mutt-* set textwidth=72
Actually, since vim 5.4 or so, this is even easier:
autocmd FileType mail set textwidth=
il server)
Indeed, I have been doing exactly that and it works great. I run Solar
Designer's 'popa3d' on port 110 for those users which do not have
clients supporting TLS, but those who do are encouraged to use the
POP3/TLS running on port 995 which is really just an stunnel to port
On Jul 30, 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> An easier way would be to use the autocmd feature of vim. I use it for
> example this way:
>
> |autocmd BufNewFile,BufReadPost reportbug*,mutt-* set textwidth=72
Actually, since vim 5.4 or so, this is even easier:
autocmd FileType mail set textwidth
owever. But at
least it is secure past my local system.
> On 20010730.2244, Rafal Kupka said ...
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0200, Rafal Kupka wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> > via popa3d.
Kupka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: pop3
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my ma
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
Hello,
[cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
>
> I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
>
> /home/user/.fetchmailrc:
> --
il server)
Indeed, I have been doing exactly that and it works great. I run Solar
Designer's 'popa3d' on port 110 for those users which do not have
clients supporting TLS, but those who do are encouraged to use the
POP3/TLS running on port 995 which is really just an stunnel to port
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:47:46PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> I'm more worried about people seeing
> my pop3 service as a potential door into my network.
See my first reply to you
Thank you everyone, I value all the comments ive been receiving on the
subject. :) However when I was referring to secure, i meant more along the
lines of "stable". I understand the pop3 protocol and know its limitations
as far as plaintext passwords are concerned, and I fully inte
owever. But at
least it is secure past my local system.
> On 20010730.2244, Rafal Kupka said ...
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0200, Rafal Kupka wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> > via popa3d.
Kupka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: pop3
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening u
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
Hello,
[cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
>
> I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
>
> /home/user/.fetchmailrc:
> --
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:47:46PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> I'm more worried about people seeing
> my pop3 service as a potential door into my network.
See my first reply to you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Thank you everyone, I value all the comments ive been receiving on the
subject. :) However when I was referring to secure, i meant more along the
lines of "stable". I understand the pop3 protocol and know its limitations
as far as plaintext passwords are concerned, and I fully inte
On 01-07-30 Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> > set textwidth=72
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a li
** On Jul 30, Tamas TEVESZ scribbled:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security
> view (I will not have a lot of connections on it).
>
> www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/Zorp/ - that
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view
> (I will not have a lot of connections on it).
www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
--
[-]
Hi,
I need a pop3 proxy to protect a bad pop3server (Exc...ge). I founded:
popular
pop3proxy
perdition
Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I
will not have a lot of connections on it).
Thanks.
pgp0iDprHXzWh.pgp
Description: PGP
On 01-07-30 Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> > set textwidth=72
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a l
** On Jul 30, Tamas TEVESZ scribbled:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I
>will not have a lot of connections on it).
>
> www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/Zorp/ - that
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I will
>not have a lot of connections on it).
www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
--
[-]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Hi,
I need a pop3 proxy to protect a bad pop3server (Exc...ge). I founded:
popular
pop3proxy
perdition
Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I will
not have a lot of connections on it).
Thanks.
PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:10:29PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> >
> > set textwidth=72
> >
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
>
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edit
> I've you are using vim use:
>
> set textwidth=72
>
> in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a line
in my .muttrc that goes something like this:
Hello,
actually the most secure pop3 server we've tried at work was qpoper. The only
problem is it's too slow for a massive use (hosting service) and we had to
write our own one. But it's still quite good, and I'd advice you to use it
fred
On Sunday 29 July 2001 22:
[On 30 Jul, 2001, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote in " Re: pop3 "]
> > PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> > of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> > GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:10:29PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> >
> > set textwidth=72
> >
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
>
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edi
> I've you are using vim use:
>
> set textwidth=72
>
> in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a line
in my .muttrc that goes something like this:
Hello,
actually the most secure pop3 server we've tried at work was qpoper. The only
problem is it's too slow for a massive use (hosting service) and we had to
write our own one. But it's still quite good, and I'd advice you to use it
fred
On Sunday 29 July 2001 22:
[On 30 Jul, 2001, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote in " Re: pop3 "]
> > PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> > of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> > GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not
> PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> mutt. Anyone know why?
You have to set it manually, and a lot of people probabl
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:14:49PM -0600, Hubert Chan wrote:
> PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> mutt. Anyone know
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:14:49PM -0600, Hubert Chan wrote:
> PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> mutt. Anyone know w
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
> I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to get a
> good idea from you guys on which one to install.
Greetings,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pedro> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
>> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3
> On 20010729.2024, Pedro Zorzenon Neto said ...
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> > Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
> > I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to ge
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
Here is one decent one:
http://www.openwall.com/popa3d/
solid-POP3 has support for encryption on login (not sure about mail
transfer). I haven't tried it out yet, but i know its there.
Moe Harley wrote:
Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
> I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to get a
> good idea from you guys on which one to install.
Hi Moe,
All
> PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> mutt. Anyone know why?
You have to set it manually, and a lot of people probab
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:14:49PM -0600, Hubert Chan wrote:
> PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> mutt. Anyone know
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:14:49PM -0600, Hubert Chan wrote:
> PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> mutt. Anyone know
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
> I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to get a
> good idea from you guys on which one to install.
Greetings,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pedro> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
>> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3
> On 20010729.2024, Pedro Zorzenon Neto said ...
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> > Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
> > I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to ge
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
Here is one decent one:
http://www.openwall.com/popa3d/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
solid-POP3 has support for encryption on login (not sure about mail
transfer). I haven't tried it out yet, but i know its there.
Moe Harley wrote:
>Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
>I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
> I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to get a
> good idea from you guys on which one to install.
Hi Moe,
All
Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to get a
good idea from you guys on which one to install.
Thought i'd ask what the general opinion is on the most secure pop3 daemon.
I need to install a pop3 damon on my debian machine, but I wanted to get a
good idea from you guys on which one to install.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
