Re: potato camediaplay security problem

2001-03-12 Thread David Coe
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this important enough to backport to potato? If so, should I do > that myself, or should the security team? Thanks. Sorry, I posted that to the wrong list. Have sent it to the correct list now.

potato camediaplay security problem

2001-03-12 Thread David Coe
Is this important enough to backport to potato? If so, should I do that myself, or should the security team? Thanks. The potato version of camediaplay, camediaplay980118-1 Still Camera Digital Interface installs its binary suid 'uucp': -r-sr-xr-x1 uucp bin 17132

Re: potato camediaplay security problem

2001-03-11 Thread David Coe
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this important enough to backport to potato? If so, should I do > that myself, or should the security team? Thanks. Sorry, I posted that to the wrong list. Have sent it to the correct list now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

potato camediaplay security problem

2001-03-11 Thread David Coe
Is this important enough to backport to potato? If so, should I do that myself, or should the security team? Thanks. The potato version of camediaplay, camediaplay980118-1 Still Camera Digital Interface installs its binary suid 'uucp': -r-sr-xr-x1 uucp bin 1713