Hi Charles,
On 2024-07-09 14:48:21, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
In the end of the month we will have DebCamp and DebConf happening and
I'd like to organize a team sprint during DebCamp. DebCamp will take
place from Sunday July 21st to Saturday July 27th, but I'll only arrive
on 23rd.
So,
Hi Samuel,
On 2024-06-08 14:30:40, Samuel Henrique wrote:
I am excited to let you know that Peter and me completed our exams
successfully and have been granted DD access this morning.
Awesome! Congratulations to you both!
thank you very much!
My appreciation goes to everybody I worked with
Dear Sven,
On 2024-01-06 10:58:41 +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 20:59 +, Peter Wienemann wrote:
The suggested fix for #1048666 works but it is
not particularly nice. If someone knows a smarter way how to address
this issue, I am eager to learn about it.
Instead of
Dear security tools packaging team,
I pushed two commits to the ncrack repository [0] fixing two bugs:
https://bugs.debian.org/1058286
https://bugs.debian.org/1048666
#1058286 is an RC bug. The suggested fix for #1048666 works but it is
not particularly nice. If someone knows a smarter way how
Dear security tools packaging team,
I have prepared the Debian packaging of a new upstream release of
ssldump (version 1.8):
https://salsa.debian.org/wiene/ssldump
This release introduces a cmake based build system which fixes #1049319
as a by-product.
It would be great if someone could re
Hi Sven,
On 24.10.23 01:13, Sven Geuer wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. However, I am unsure if lintian would
still complain in regards to argon2 (and also dnstwist) as the package
is not a new one anymore. The explanation in [1] cleary states
This package appears to be the first packag
Dear Sven,
On 23.10.23 17:19, Sven Geuer wrote:
I would prefer to remove the 0~ prefix from the package version,
resulting in an upcoming version of 20190702+dfsg-4 instead of
0~20190702+dfsg-4. This would align the version in Debian to other
distros, see [1] for details.
Are there arguments to
Dear Samuel, dear security tools team,
On 03.05.20 15:38, Samuel Henrique wrote:
Peter, I noticed you are the maintainer of the package and is also a
DM, so I gave you permission to the repository, maintainers should be
able to push to their packages' repos.
I forgot to mention, this permissio
Hi Samuel,
On 29.08.21 18:06, Samuel Henrique wrote:
I've tried to build around 10 times with --max-parallel=12 (causes
-j12) and I got around 2 builds to succeed.
This might be a red herring, but are you running sbuild with the
performance tweaks explained in the wiki[0], by any chance? I'm us
Hi Samuel,
On 29.08.21 15:41, Samuel Henrique wrote:
I need help investigating why mdk4 randomly fails to build when in
parallel, I've been through the build log and couldn't spot anything.
The failure rate with -j16 is around 85%, I couldn't reproduce the
issue with -j1.
I also can't reproduc
Dear Francisco,
On 08.01.21 17:56, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
On 1/8/21 9:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
He also pointed towards a possible upstream fix. Do you want to look into
backporting this?
I tried to get the latest version (0.7.0+git20201012.93724e4), applied
the patch
htt
Hi Samuel,
On 11.08.20 23:09, Samuel Henrique wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:38:52 PM EDT Peter Wienemann wrote:
>>> @Security tools team: I requested a review/upload of a new version of
>>> dnstwist last week [0]. Given Scott's planned NMU it might be good
Hi Scott,
On 11.08.20 17:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Unless you object, I'll probably do an NMU to do that since this will block
> dnspython testing migration. I'll
> post a diff to the bug before I do.
that is fine with me.
@Security tools team: I requested a review/upload of a new version o
Dear security tools team,
I prepared a new version of dnstwist (20200707):
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/dnstwist
It would be great if someone could review my changes and (if everything
looks satisfactory) upload the new version.
Thanks, Peter
Hi SZ,
On 27.04.20 08:09, SZ Lin (林上智) wrote:
> Can you send the MR to the team repository[1]?
>
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/dnstwist
what precisely do you want me to do? Usually a MR relates one source
branch to one destination branch. But the mentioned changes affect three
Dear security tools team,
On 11.04.20 15:11, Peter Wienemann wrote:
> could someone please review the changes in
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/wiene-guest/dnstwist
>
> and - provided they look OK - push the changes to the corresponding
> repository in the team area and upload.
Hi,
could someone please review the changes in
https://salsa.debian.org/wiene-guest/dnstwist
and - provided they look OK - push the changes to the corresponding
repository in the team area and upload.
This fixes an issue in the test suite which blocks migration to testing.
Thanks, Peter
Hi SZ,
On 25.03.20 04:39, SZ Lin (林上智) wrote:
> Thanks for your contribution, I've created this repository and import your
> commits in the pkg-security team.
>
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/dnstwist
[...]
> I didn't see any issues, but one thing to be aware of that someone
>
Dear DDs,
I prepared packaging for the domain name permutation engine "dnstwist"
(ITP bug #948237). The git repository is currently available at
https://salsa.debian.org/wiene-guest/dnstwist
It would be great if someone could review the code, provide feedback and
- once everything looks fine - t
Hi Thiago,
On 31.10.19 16:18, Thiago Marques wrote:
> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/arp-scan/tree/arp-scan_1.9.5-2
> [...]
> The cowbuilder is working perfectly but CI Test on Salsa didn't work.
I cannot help with the upload (due to insufficient rights) but I looked
into the build fa
20 matches
Mail list logo