On moandei 11 Maaie 2009, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
security team,
should the DSA announcement be reissued to correct/clarify?
That should not be necessary. The DSA mails pertain to the state of afairs in
old/stable; we mention sid fixed versions as a courtesy but I don't see it
necessary to
On moandei 11 Maaie 2009, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
security team,
should the DSA announcement be reissued to correct/clarify?
That should not be necessary. The DSA mails pertain to the state of afairs in
old/stable; we mention sid fixed versions as a courtesy but I don't see it
necessary to
On Sat, 9 May 2009 17:31:11 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi everyone!
DSA-1789-1 [1] claims that all the mentioned CVEs are fixed in
php5/5.2.9.dfsg.1-1 for sid.
All tracker pages for the mentioned CVEs seem to be consistent, except
for the one for CVE-2008-5814 [2], which claims that sid is
Hi everyone!
DSA-1789-1 [1] claims that all the mentioned CVEs are fixed in
php5/5.2.9.dfsg.1-1 for sid.
All tracker pages for the mentioned CVEs seem to be consistent, except
for the one for CVE-2008-5814 [2], which claims that sid is still
vulnerable.
[1]
4 matches
Mail list logo