On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 02:14:58AM +0100, Chris Wren (Sparc-Debian) wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I'm having a problem getting X to work, now that I have upgraded to
> Woody. running through the config, I set the card as sunffb but then
> asked for the video cards bus identifier.
>
> I understand that
Hi Guys
I'm having a problem getting X to work, now that I have upgraded to
Woody. running through the config, I set the card as sunffb but then
asked for the video cards bus identifier.
I understand that the Creator card in not PCI but UPA:
>Jul 26 01:28:24 i03sw0034 unix: SUNW,ffb0 at root
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 03:32:39PM -0500, Igor T?mara wrote:
> Hi I upgraded to Woody from 2.2r6, there are plenty of packages useful
> for that machine, but unfortunately I haven't been able to find a
> solution for the problem of setting up XFree, I went to an address where
> someone in the li
Hi I upgraded to Woody from 2.2r6, there are plenty of packages useful
for that machine, but unfortunately I haven't been able to find a
solution for the problem of setting up XFree, I went to an address where
someone in the list found a solution with the framebuffer, but it was
broken :( .
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:37:50 EDT, Ben Collins writes:
>> gonzales:/home/waldner# dpkg --configure -a
>> Setting up locales (2.2.5-10) ...
>To get you through the upgrade, I suggest temporarily removing the
>locales package. Reinstall it after the upgrade is complete, if you
>want.
Well, apt/dpkg
Zitiere Yann Marigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hallo,
> I do not have tried Woody yet, but it will probably work fine.
> Use 2.2.20 or 2.2.21 kernel, more is a bit flawless ;-)
I use a Sparc Classic as firewall with kernel 2.4.17, no
problem.
> Yes, I think... look here:
> http://www.debian.org/CD/v
>Hello folks,
Hello!
>Is it possible to install Debian on an old Sparc Classic Workstation ?
Yes, I've two Classic running Debian Potato
>If yes, what for version of Debian ?
I do not have tried Woody yet, but it will probably work fine.
Use 2.2.20 or 2.2.21 kernel, more is a bit flawless ;-)
Hello
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Joshua Uziel wrote:
> The U5 and U10 are decent machines... moreso on the systems with the
> 2MB ecache (most of the U10s, and some of the U5s). One problem
> with those systems is that they have a CMD646U for an EIDE
> controller... a buggy chipset that Linux deals wit
On or about Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:47:15PM -0400, James Fowler typed:
>First, the binary listed in the email entry refered to below doesn't exist
>on the server. So, no worries, I will compile it right (it has directions
>to modify the source).
In the old days of the Web we used a trick called
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:59:55 PDT, Neil Gruending writes:
>>> Since named isn't resolving, how can I
>>> finish upgrading my system, or do I need to burn a CD and start over?
>Looks like I lied earlier - I can't ping anything, including localhost! I
>keep on getting "Network is unreachable" error
10 matches
Mail list logo
