On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 04:17:40PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 13.05.2013 13:45, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > Michael,
> >
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >>> Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
> >>> wondering, if vio_ty
Regarding the situation with kernel 3.8 for sparc no longer found in
the Debian repositories, please clarify if Jurij Smakov resigning as
sparc port maintainer is pertinent:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2013/05/msg8.html
In any event, even if it is no longer being maintained, an impor
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
> architectures with non-working java7.
Just asking as a loongson-2f user, :-)
What makes java7 not to work on those architectures? Building issues?
> ...
> So the
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 16:26:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 13, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the
> > related utils in udev IMO.
> Actually the root issue is that the helper is (was?) needed only because
> the kernel does no
Hey Matthias
On 06/05/13 15:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
architectures with non-working java7.
+1
Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly
submitted by James Page. Some may be still lur
On May 13, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the
> related utils in udev IMO.
Actually the root issue is that the helper is (was?) needed only because
the kernel does not provide the data needed to allow autoloading these
drivers.
So if we a
Am 13.05.2013 13:45, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> Michael,
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>>> Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
>>> wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils
>>> [2] package, where it
Michael,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
> > wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils
> > [2] package, where it would be maintained and tested by people with
> > kn
8 matches
Mail list logo