On 21/12/15 11:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
We just reached the milestone of 10,000 up-to-date packages in the
sparc64 archive. There are only around 1,500 to go which are needed
to catch up with the releases architectures.
Mazel tov! :)
--
Best wishes,
Bob
Just a note:
sparc arch removal also affected some SPARC-specific packages[1] (e. g.,
"SILO" bootloader).
According to Aurelien Jarno,[2] they should be re-uploaded to "unreleased".
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/07/msg00037.html
[2]
On 09/08/15 08:55, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Bob Bib (bob...@ukr.net):
What do you mean by attic? (Probably a newbie question, sorry).
...
That's a special directory named attic in the Debian Installer git
repository, where we store old stuff, just like people do in their
attics
On 08/08/15 20:01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
...
I just moved silo-installer out to the attic this morning.
What do you mean by attic? (Probably a newbie question, sorry).
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Following the sparc removal[1], some sparc-specific source packages
(e. g., silo sparc-utils) have also been removed[2].
Obviously, they should be re-uploaded to debian-ports[3],
to be built for sparc64.
I wonder if the debian-ports have any package / bug tracking system,
or is there any other
On 28/07/15 12:11, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Bob Bib wrote:
Hmm, could it affect some sparc[64]-only packages in a bad way (e. g.,
source package getting removed and no more available for debian-ports)?
[...]
E. g., silo is Architecture: sparc sparc64.
Source packages which no longer build
On 28/07/15 13:09, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
Thank you! I was not aware of the sparc64 port.
And now I guess I've missed the point where sparc was removed from sid.
Yep...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/07/msg00023.html
Is there a way of switching to sparc64 port directly from
On 23/07/15 11:56, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to install something newer than Wheezy?
Or install Wheezy and upgrade it to something newer?
Any recommendations?
Hi,
probably wheezy - sid (until sparc gets removed* from Sid).
After that, probably, only sid sparc64 from
2014-01-12, Karel Gardas:
Anyway, it looks like Linux is really not well supported on SPARC
anymore. Where are those times when Jakub Jelinek done his first
UltraLinux in 90s
I would prefer to say it's _still_ not supported well;
let's hope for more active development:
Hello Karel and Joachim,
2014-01-09, Karel Gardas:
I'm curious what's the status of Debian or
general Linux on SPARC or SPARC64. I've read that Debian removed SPARC
port from testing/unstable in 2014 so I'm curious if I shall deal with
compatiblity issues between Solaris/Linux or not at
2014-11-09 from Mark Cave-Ayland:
Panic over.
It seems that the latest build has increased the memory requirement
above QEMU's 128MB built-in default. Increasing the RAM to 256MB seems
to get things going again:
$ ./qemu-system-sparc64 -m 256 -cdrom
11 matches
Mail list logo
