ntifier "Card2"
> > >Driver "vesa"
> > >BusID "PCI:1:2:0"
> > >
> > >
> > >This looks wrong to me, one of them should be using sunffb driver. And
> > >why all three drivers refer
Op 20081213 om 17:14 schreef Klaus Klein:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
>> Op 20081213 om 13:54 schreef Frans Pop:
>>> I've looked at the logs you sent me provately and the first showed a
>>> stupid syntax error in the reopen-console script. I've just uploaded
daily images by looking at:
> http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/MANIFEST.udebs
The temporary udeb is named rootskel 1.72+localudeb
and will be gone after tomorrow.
Feedback of the new tests are welcome.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ack.
Send to $bugreportnum...@bugs.debian.org the log files.
By keeping the BR opening E-mail small, will the BR closing msg also small.
That is because the closing message contains the complete opening mail.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
then to backport the e1000e
driver to the previous Debian release.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e "black list file"
Being curious about the full path, I searched on system here available
and found /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
It didn't contain module names I had add myself, so now
I'm curious if /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist works for the original poster.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
Access MMU Miss
I did seen such messages myself. I got them at a warm boot and
could resolve them by a cold boot. (power down, machine gets cold, power up)
> Error -256
>
> Stack Underflow
>
> ok
>
> Help me !!!!
> Thanks in advance.
Real feedback is also appriciated, espec
Op 20080929 om 12:27 schreef Gerfried Fuchs:
> Am Samstag, den 27.09.2008, 21:08 -0400 schrieb Pablo Elías Abarca Salvo:
> > Hey, I need to know which version of Debian I used to a Sparc Classic 4.
>
> Personally I am not sure, but I guess debian-sparc@lists.debian.org is
> the better list to as
Op 20080824 om 15:25 schreef Christian Euler:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I plugged a PCI USB card in my good old Ultra 5 box (running Debian Etch
> with 2.6.24 kernel), but the card doesnt show up in lspci.
>
> Is there anything special about PCI support on UltraSparc?
Not as far I known.
I think the
> 'high'
> Apr 11 02:02:16 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to high
> Apr 11 02:02:16 main-menu[599]: INFO: Menu item 'download-installer' selected
Please elaborate "it isn't working with todays daily"
What kind of error does occure?
Could the error message(s?) be posted to the list?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
likely on ttya.
About documenting succes:
At Sparc side I use ttya, the 25-pins connector,
at the other side a real[1] serialport
and inbetween 9600baud 8N1
Cheers
Geert Stappers
[1] 'real' as in "not a USB to serial convertor"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mpt to
> key in the username, the console responds to what looks like a
> carriage return and i cannot see what i type.
>
> any help much appreciated.
I assume a mismatch in parity and/or word size.
> beej
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
found)
Futher: I think it is a good thing to file an installation report
for your computer,
see http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.sparc/ch05s03.html#problem-report
for more information. Especial because you want that the next install
is even smoother.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Op 27-01-2008 om 20:36 schreef Chris Andrew:
> On 27/01/2008, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Op 26-01-2008 om 14:11 schreef Chris Andrew:
> > > Hi, all.
> > >
> > > I've just rebuilt my Ultra 10, with different drives. Unfortunat
e CDROM driver also a SCSI device? ( It might be IDE ... )
> Oh, perhaps I can have an IDE PCI card on E250 use an IDE HDD to boot.
The original idea[1] of PCI was, to put machine independent program code
in the ROMs of the cards. So when you have IDE PCI card with bootROM,
that boots for
000 600 dump
does work fine, but I think you want
4400 200 dump
for screen size reasons.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op 22-01-2008 om 21:31 schreef Hero_xbd!.RRR:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
>> Could it be firewall software on the TFTP server?
>
> I am using fail2ban[1] on the TFTP server, which functions on iptables and
> is supposed to modify only "ftp ftps ftp-data ftps-data ssh"po
Op 22-01-2008 om 11:01 schreef Hero_xbd!.RRR:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
>> My advise is to check the version the tftpd server.
>> Over here says `dpkg -l tftpd-hpa` that I'm using version 0.48-1.
>>
>> For reference you may wireshark
>> http://www.stapp
succesfull netboots on an Ultra 5, it has OpenBoot 3.19.
As tftp server is also tftpd-hpa used, under inetd. But shouldn't make
a difference. Difference is that I don't do '-r blocksize'
Cheers
Geert Stappers
DD
[1]
I'm willing to check a wireshark slash tcpdump .pcap fil
Op 10-01-2008 om 15:26 schreef ?? / Nishant:
> On Jan 10, 2008 3:10 PM, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the way to get to the OK prompt
> > when the console is a serial terminal?
>
> My experience says - powercycle the box and rem
to get the OK prompt, but didn't get it.
What is the way to get to the OK prompt
when the console is a serial terminal?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For your information
- Forwarded message from Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unidentified subject!
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:57:14 +0200
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Thu, Ma
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:16:17AM +0200, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
> (CCing Geert Stappers and debian-sparc list)
( this message is also crossposted and assumes subscription to MLs )
> Just a question: how can I edit my own boot.img? I'm new to D-I and I
> would like to cust
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:59:45PM -0700, Tyler wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >The default kernel for sparc64 installations is now 2.6.12,
> >with 2.4.27 as alternative.
> >
> >
> What is the address where the daily builds are available? Also, does
> this imply that there is a *wor
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:53:32PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 22:45, Geert Stappers wrote:
| | [ kernel upgrade from 2.4 to 2.6 causes broken keyboard setup ]
> >
> >Login by ssh or serial line to cover keyboard.
Login by ssh or serial
Hi,
The message below showed up on debian-boot@lists.debian.org
and now it is at the Sparc mailinglist of Debian.
Please update the Silo bugreports with the information that you have.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From:
same CD...i can boot
> freebsd rom cd
>
> why??
> i have tried also to reburn cdrom...change CDROM ..change Operative
> sistem...like netbsd openbsd ecc... but The only sistem boot from Cd
> is sun 10..
> anybody have any idea?
Something wrong with the image?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Any ideas?
Convines us that it is debian-sparc@lists.debian.org related.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
Choose the forum carefully --smart questions rule #1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tf8 charset support.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
en 172.16.56.152 (this is my tftp - server's IP address)
> Unimplemented Sparc System Call 188 (propably unrelated)
> Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init
> press L1
>
> Can anybody help me out of this? Many thanks in advance,
> take care
"boot net vmlinuz ramdis
Try http://www.stappers.nl/gst/pool/main/s/silo/silo_1.4.8-1.01_sparc.deb
and tell us your milage.
> Walt Williams
Geert Stappers
# md5sum silo_1.4.8-1.01_sparc.deb
5a5dfbb8192b6a9e04bff25b37e9eed6 silo_1.4.8-1.01_sparc.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux
t;
> if i boot solaris, it boot without any trouble.
>
> is the fs wrong?
I think you have something mixed up.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
computer
Assemble the computer
> thanks,
The price is to tell what worked :-)
> matt zagrabelny
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hich program did report
"The file just load does not appear to be executable"
>
> Best regards
>
> Admar
Geert Stappers
wrong here? I'd really like to use the 2.6 kernel
> on this machine.
Update http://bugs.debian.org/261824
> Thanks in advance,
Learn to use the Debian Bug Tracking System.
> Matt
Geert Stappers
pgpD6ZvJ1doi2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;
> >From dmesg:
> ttyS0 at MMIO 0x0 (irq = 44) is a SunZilog
>
> Thanks,
My appology for saying "it can't be done"
Geert Stappers
pgpRd6h86xPMZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mt_elf.o
>
> anyone have thoughts?
Think logical, write in the logical order.
Is the kernel aware of the serial ports? (insmod?)
> mark
>
>
>
> >
> > thanx everyone !
> >
Top quoter :/
> > mark
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgptObg5GxB3h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rror is also helpfull.
> Thanks,
>
> Herminder
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpD3wDZf8rqI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:56:18AM -0400, John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:07:19PM -0400, John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to install Debian 3.0 on an Ultra 5.
ous if you will encounter http://bugs.debian.org/267428
which is also about a "conflict" of Ultra 5 and silo.
> Thanks in advace.
Feedback is always good.
> John
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpnTObBNqNwL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
40 matches
Mail list logo
