Hi Jan,
> On Friday 2024-05-10 15:59, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>Stuff Received writes:
>>
>>> On 2024-05-10 07:44, Rainer Orth wrote (in part):
>>>
>>>> Besides, if John had ever tried to build either GCC 13 or 14 on Solaris
>>>> 11.
Stuff Received writes:
> On 2024-05-10 07:44, Rainer Orth wrote (in part):
>
>> Besides, if John had ever tried to build either GCC 13 or 14 on Solaris
>> 11.3, gcc/configure would have told him about the obsoletion in no
>> uncertain terms.
>
> No, the option --
se in the future when SPARC
>> > support in Illumos has matured enough that people can switch over their
>> > machines.
>>
>> As has been noted, SPARC is on its way out for Illumos.
>
> Which makes my point to keep Solaris 11.3 support even more valid.
You can keep wishing, but I won't be doing the work. It's that simple.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
it had been for Solaris 7, 8 or 9, I would totally understand. But even
> Solaris 10
> is something that Oracle still supports [1].
Right, and you pay an arm and a leg for that. Yet, Solaris 10 support
was removed from GCC 10 back in 2019 without much fuss.
Rainer
--
-
Hi Richard,
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:54 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Rainer,
>>
>> On Fri, 2024-05-10 at 10:20 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> > > > Support for Solaris 11.3 had already been obsoleted in GCC 13.
>> &g
on Solaris 11.3) instead?
> Removing Solaris 11.3 support might make sense in the future when SPARC
> support in Illumos has matured enough that people can switch over their
> machines.
As has been noted, SPARC is on its way out for Illumos.
Rainer
--
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
