ld be good if a Hurd porter could perhaps
see why--I can't see anything obviously wrong..
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.n
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:
linker. See the already filed bug reports.
This change is one I can agree with on technical grounds, though it
will cause a great deal of pain in the short term. Have we got any
estimates on exactly how much breakage will result before the change
gets made?
Regards,
Roger
--
.'&#
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>>> While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
>>>> preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
>>
library changes how it works but
without changing its public interface, I could be screwed again in six
months time. This is partly the fault of Boost for exposing its
internals in its headers, but disallowing indirect linking make it
worse.
Overall, it could be for the best, but it will be painf
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
&
*should not be
second-guessing the user*. This can break perfectly legitimate code
making use of ELF constructors and other features which won't be
picked out just by looking at symbol usage.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://p
7 matches
Mail list logo
