Nigel Horne wrote:
> Joachim Reichel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would like to investigate whether my package cgal is vulnerable to bug
>> #431230 on mips, mipsel and sparc. I'm not a DD (so I can't use any
>> official porter machines), but my key 153FF940 is signed by a DD. Is
>> there someone willing to
David S. Miller wrote:
[snip]
> This is not a bug, it should be closed. On sparc64, gcc should emit
> 64-bit code by default. If you want 32-bit code emitted on a sparc64
> system you have exactly two options 1) add -m32 to the command line
> or 2) run your build in a "sparc32 bash" environment.
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
> available information to provide the needed file
Joey Hess wrote:
[snip]
> No, the CD is built with the one from debian-cd CVS, attached.
>
> --
> see shy jo
> partition=1
> timeout=600
> read-only
> message=/boot/debian.txt
> default=linux
> append="cdrom devfs=mount"
I wonder why the devfs= is still used here. Most architectures ceased
to u
4 matches
Mail list logo
