Source: parted
Source-Version: 2.2-1
(Note that this is still in NEW, and is currently targeted at
experimental but we plan to move it to unstable soon; I'm
version-closing it while I remember.)
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:54:39PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
I've read through the patch, but must
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:04:05PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
My main concern is whether it affects installer in any adverse way, so
if you could arrange for an installer image to be built with the
modified
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:04:05PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
My main concern is whether it affects installer in any adverse way, so
if you could arrange for an installer image to be built with the
modified parted, we could do some
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:53:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
What's the status of this bug, can the patch be applied to fix it?
Ditto, and getting debian-sparc in the loop.
Executive summary for the sparc porters, there's a patch to fix disk
label b0rkage on sparc with parted. The patch has been
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:27:14PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:53:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
What's the status of this bug, can the patch be applied to fix it?
Ditto, and getting debian-sparc in the loop.
Executive summary for the sparc porters, there's a
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:04:05PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
My main concern is whether it affects installer in any adverse way, so
if you could arrange for an installer image to be built with the
modified parted, we could do some testing. I don't have access to a
machine which supports
6 matches
Mail list logo
