At 7:19 AM -0700 7/7/98, John Goerzen wrote:
>Can we put these changes into the appropriate file (libc6-dev)?
The right solution is to upgrade the sources, later snapshots of glibc 2.1
have /usr/include/netatalk/at.h.
The other problem, apparently needs to be solved by using 2.1 kernel
headers, th
Can we put these changes into the appropriate file (libc6-dev)?
John
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Johnie Ingram wrote:
>
> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> /usr/include/bits/sockunion.h:29, from
> John> /usr/include/sys/socket.h:37, from
> John> ../../../methods/http/http.cc
"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> /usr/include/bits/sockunion.h:29, from
John> /usr/include/sys/socket.h:37, from
John> ../../../methods/http/http.cc:48:
John> /usr/include/netrose/rose.h:23: linux/rose.h: No such file or
In /usr/include/bits/sockunion.h, remove the #inclu
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the latest version of apt for the sparc platform. I
get some very, very strange error messages. I've included them below.
Specifically, I am wondering that the heck this /usr/include/bits
directory is, what the netrose stuff is (i386 has neither of these), and
why it ap
4 matches
Mail list logo