Eric,
Sunday evening I got around to trying your code
snippet out. I had to use a different variable
name to match up to what was in the file in
2.2.25, but otherwise seemed like a reasonable
match. The original code in my code tree is:
/* Sometimes Antares cards come up not completely
I have an sbus antares (actually a qlogic)
fast/wide scsi2 controller in my ss20 that the
bootprom finds and solaris found and used but
my 2.2.25 kernel flags as missing an interrupt
and skips over.
I'm wondering whether I need a driver option
in order to use the controller with the 2.2.X
Heitzso wrote:
I have an sbus antares (actually a qlogic)
fast/wide scsi2 controller in my ss20 that the
bootprom finds and solaris found and used but
my 2.2.25 kernel flags as missing an interrupt
and skips over.
I think you are talking seeing this:
/* Sometimes Antares cards
I ran the prtconf as you suggested and the following stanza
comes up for the qlogic controller:
Node 0xffd7b350
scsi-initiator-id: 0007
device_type: 'scsi'
interrupts: 0003
wide: 00
Yep-- missing the intr property.
I'd suggest you have two choices:
1) backport my interrupts-decoders patch from current BK 2.4.x to 2.2.x
2) migrate to a later BK 2.4.x kernel with the patch already included
(the patch has been in BK for around 9 months)
The interrupts-decoders patch
Eric Brower wrote:
Heitzso wrote:
I have an sbus antares (actually a qlogic)
fast/wide scsi2 controller in my ss20 that the
bootprom finds and solaris found and used but
my 2.2.25 kernel flags as missing an interrupt
and skips over.
I think you are talking seeing this:
/*
I've glanced at the patch at
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/user=zaitcev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(please confirm the URL, the full URL below didn't go anywhere, thanks).
I'll look at equiv 2.2.25 code then decide whether to go simple
test route or full backport merge. May be a few days before
The URL does not end at ...nav= so your email reader is probably not
hyperlinking the entire URL. Copy the entire line verbatim and it
should work fine (does for me).
I think the one-liner change should be good enough as a test point.
E
Heitzso wrote:
I've glanced at the patch at
8 matches
Mail list logo
