> Is the above your complete iptables ruleset? Is this ruleset on the mail
>
> server in question, or on a seperate box? If on a seperate box, is it
>
> acting as a router, are you doing any NAT?
It's all on the same box. It's a complete ruleset except the additional DROP
lines which are identi
No other rules, see next post..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/572de1d1-09a2-4adb-a3b1-ea1c031f3...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:13:21PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > On Sid I have:
> > > openssh-client 1:6.0p1-3
> > > Depends: ... libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.1) ...
> > > Make sure that at the least both of those are up to date.
> >
> > Thanks for this sugge
Łukasz Tkacz wrote:
> I use php-fpm + nginx + mariadb on Debian wheezy x64 I decided to chroot
> php using build-in chroot feature. After changes in nginx vhost conf and
> php db conf (from localhost to IP for mysql) php and mysql works fine (I
> can connect to database, use phpmyadmin etc.), but
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 02:33:54PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 02:13 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> > Ummm, no. dpkg triggers still operate as per normal.
> > There is no need to edit anything!
>
> So a default only add
>
> Foo Kernel_version
>
> and
Le 24.12.2012 00:41, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2012 23:31:37 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
I do not know what kind of interface your are accustomed to, but you
could try XFCE or LXDE.
In fact, you could also install more than one, and try them from
time
to time, in the
On Sunday 23 December 2012 23:31:37 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I do not know what kind of interface your are accustomed to, but you
> could try XFCE or LXDE.
> In fact, you could also install more than one, and try them from time
> to time, in the login manager, you can often choose the
Le 24.12.2012 00:08, Thore a écrit :
Am 23.12.2012 22:19, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 23.12.2012 20:48, Thore a écrit :
Am 23.12.2012 20:45, schrieb Thore:
Am 23.12.2012 17:32, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Both entrys have a pae, my question is: can (and how can) I
Am 23.12.2012 22:19, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 23.12.2012 20:48, Thore a écrit :
Am 23.12.2012 20:45, schrieb Thore:
Am 23.12.2012 17:32, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Both entrys have a pae, my question is: can (and how can) I remove
the ...-2-686-pae entry?
As ma
Le 23.12.2012 20:48, Thore a écrit :
Am 23.12.2012 20:45, schrieb Thore:
Am 23.12.2012 17:32, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Both entrys have a pae, my question is: can (and how can) I remove
the ...-2-686-pae entry?
As many other people said, your usual package manager is able to
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 05:10:45AM -0800, Mark Ford wrote:
> I am hoping someone can help show me where I'm going wrong.
> I have iptables setup in the following way, basically, I am
> using the chain "pests" to drop data from certain IPs.
>
>
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt
Do you have an iptables rule somewhere that is allowing smtp?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87623ssc9u@thumper.dhh.gt.org
I've checked my mainlog and the originating ip appears to be exactly the same
as the email header; 67.228.245.121
Could it be ip spoofing? How would they do that?
Or maybe exim is somehow accepting connections over udp? - I'm clutching at
straws!
Hoping someone can help me solve this. Thank yo
Am 23.12.2012 20:45, schrieb Thore:
Am 23.12.2012 17:32, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Both entrys have a pae, my question is: can (and how can) I remove
the ...-2-686-pae entry?
As many other people said, your usual package manager is able to
remove kernels. Aptitude will warn you i
Am 23.12.2012 17:32, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Both entrys have a pae, my question is: can (and how can) I remove
the ...-2-686-pae entry?
As many other people said, your usual package manager is able to
remove kernels. Aptitude will warn you if you are removing the last
kernel o
On 23 December 2012 16:41, Mark Ford wrote:
> Here is a shortened version of the output from iptables-save (full version
> simply has more "-A pests" lines).
>
> # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.8 on Sun Dec 23 16:24:43 2012
> *filter
> :INPUT ACCEPT [252417:278747603]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
>
Mark Ford a écrit :
> Here is a shortened version of the output from iptables-save (full version
> simply has more "-A pests" lines).
>
> # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.8 on Sun Dec 23 16:24:43 2012
> *filter
> :INPUT ACCEPT [252417:278747603]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [255016:2
Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
Lars Noodén gmail.com> writes:
You can specify which directory the web server looks for, such as
~/public/www, if the default ~/public_html is not to your liking.
OK!
But, what do you suggest to facilitate my colleagues windows users to
administrates their sites?
Here is a shortened version of the output from iptables-save (full version
simply has more "-A pests" lines).
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.8 on Sun Dec 23 16:24:43 2012
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [252417:278747603]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [255016:258290199]
:pests - [0:0]
-A INPUT -p
Both entrys have a pae, my question is: can (and how can) I remove
the ...-2-686-pae entry?
As many other people said, your usual package manager is able to remove
kernels. Aptitude will warn you if you are removing the last kernel of
your system. And it will update grub accordingly. As others
On 12/23/2012 06:26 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2012/12/23 Lars Noodén :
>> On 12/23/2012 06:01 PM, Beco wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
Although it says that the allow/deny directives are processed in the
following order DenyUsers, AllowUsers, DenyGr
2012/12/23 Lars Noodén :
> On 12/23/2012 06:01 PM, Beco wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>>
>>> Although it says that the allow/deny directives are processed in the
>>> following order DenyUsers, AllowUsers, DenyGroups, and AllowGroups, it
>>> does not say if the fir
On 12/23/2012 06:01 PM, Beco wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>
>> Although it says that the allow/deny directives are processed in the
>> following order DenyUsers, AllowUsers, DenyGroups, and AllowGroups, it
>> does not say if the first match or last match is what
Le 23.12.2012 03:37, John Hasler a écrit :
berenger.morel writes:
I really would like to understand why people think it is a problem
to
do softwares able to run on lower hardware... if someone have any
clue, I really want to know it!
Because they aren't very good programmers. And that's a pr
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
>
> Although it says that the allow/deny directives are processed in the
> following order DenyUsers, AllowUsers, DenyGroups, and AllowGroups, it
> does not say if the first match or last match is what is applied. I've
> tried a little experim
Hello,
Mark Ford a écrit :
>
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source destination
> pests tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0
[...]
> Chain pests (1 references)
> target prot opt source destination
> DROP tcp -- 1.85.17.0/24
On 2012-12-23 14:14 +0100, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Regid Ichira wrote:
>> Isn't lintian meant to be used at build time? Isn't it a sort of
>> post build depends?
You can use lintian at any time, on both source and binary packages.
>> In that case,
On 12/23/2012 04:51 PM, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> Lars Noodén gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> You can specify which directory the web server looks for, such as
>> ~/public/www, if the default ~/public_html is not to your liking.
>
>
> OK!
>
> But, what do you suggest to facilitate my colleagues wi
Lars Noodén gmail.com> writes:
>
> You can specify which directory the web server looks for, such as
> ~/public/www, if the default ~/public_html is not to your liking.
OK!
But, what do you suggest to facilitate my colleagues windows users to
administrates their sites? They don't have familiar
Beco grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> Dear userix,
>
> I have a server with lots of students accounts, and some professors and
> admins.
>
> I wonder, what would be an easy way to freeze students access now,
> stopping them from logging via SSH, and reinstating them on February?
>
> They are par
On 12/23/2012 03:47 PM, Beco wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> On 12/23/2012 03:26 PM, Beco wrote:
>>> Dear userix,
>>>
>>> I have a server with lots of students accounts, and some professors and
>>> admins.
>>>
>>> I wonder, what would be an easy way to freeze stud
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 02:13 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:57:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 23:08 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > "dpkg --purge " works just fine. I think
> > > it
> > > even refuses if it is the one you booted from, but so
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 12/23/2012 03:26 PM, Beco wrote:
>> Dear userix,
>>
>> I have a server with lots of students accounts, and some professors and
>> admins.
>>
>> I wonder, what would be an easy way to freeze students access now,
>> stopping them from loggin
I am hoping someone can help show me where I'm going wrong.
I have iptables setup in the following way, basically, I am
using the chain "pests" to drop data from certain IPs.
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
pests tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0
On 12/23/2012 02:52 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> I want to setup some thing like this:
> http://ourdepartment.ouruniversity.edu.br/~colleague1 and so on for
> all others ones.
That would be mod_userdir
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/public_html.html
You can specify which directory the web s
On 12/23/2012 03:26 PM, Beco wrote:
> Dear userix,
>
> I have a server with lots of students accounts, and some professors and
> admins.
>
> I wonder, what would be an easy way to freeze students access now,
> stopping them from logging via SSH, and reinstating them on February?
>
> They are pa
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Regid Ichira wrote:
> Isn't lintian meant to be used at build time? Isn't it a sort of
> post build depends?
> In that case, why lintian overrides are shipped in (binary) debs?
Please file a bug against the package concerned.
--
"If you're not caref
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:57:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 23:08 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > "dpkg --purge " works just fine. I think
> > it
> > even refuses if it is the one you booted from, but sorry, I'm not
> > willing to test that myself. :)
>
> This will not
Dear userix,
I have a server with lots of students accounts, and some professors and admins.
I wonder, what would be an easy way to freeze students access now,
stopping them from logging via SSH, and reinstating them on February?
They are part of a "group" if that helps.
Thanks,
Beco
--
Dr
Hi,
I would like to set up a webserver to our department at our
University.
I already have been installed Debian stable and select "web sever"
when it asked me. So, no graphic desktop. Only Command Line and LAMP.
This server will provide our subdomain
(http://ourdepartment.ouruniversity.edu.br).
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 13:11 +0100, Thore wrote:
> What shall I do?
If you install Ubuntu, than don't install Quantal. Use the LTS, Precise.
I don't know the state of Wheezy, others on that list will report you,
if it's better to install Squeeze or Wheezy, assumed you'll install
Debian.
If it's "e
Isn't lintian meant to be used at build time? Isn't it a sort of
post build depends?
In that case, why lintian overrides are shipped in (binary) debs?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 23:08 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> "dpkg --purge " works just fine. I think
> it
> even refuses if it is the one you booted from, but sorry, I'm not
> willing to test that myself. :)
This will not remove "recovery" entries for installed kernels. You need
to edit GRUB 2 con
Am 23.12.2012 13:06, schrieb Dom:
On 23/12/12 10:50, Thore wrote:
Am 23.12.2012 01:57, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 23.12.2012 00:51, Thore a écrit :
Hello,
on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the 32bit
version with kde).
Hum, knowing that it is an alienw
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 01:57 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 23.12.2012 00:51, Thore a écrit :
> > And how can I delete it?
>
> and if everything works correctly, remove the other one.
You can remove other kernels, by removing them using the package
management. I suspect you'r
On 23/12/12 10:50, Thore wrote:
Am 23.12.2012 01:57, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 23.12.2012 00:51, Thore a écrit :
Hello,
on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the 32bit
version with kde).
Hum, knowing that it is an alienware say nothing about the processor
Hello,
I use php-fpm + nginx + mariadb on Debian wheezy x64 I decided to chroot
php using build-in chroot feature. After changes in nginx vhost conf and
php db conf (from localhost to IP for mysql) php and mysql works fine (I
can connect to database, use phpmyadmin etc.), but I can't send emails.
Am 23.12.2012 01:57, schrieb berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 23.12.2012 00:51, Thore a écrit :
Hello,
on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the 32bit
version with kde).
Hum, knowing that it is an alienware say nothing about the processor
model, so maybe the 32bit choic
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:10:00AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 23 December 2012 10:01:46 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 23 dec 12, 00:51:51, Thore wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the
> > > 32bit version with kde).
> > > Now I have a f
On Sunday 23 December 2012 10:01:46 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 23 dec 12, 00:51:51, Thore wrote:
> > Hello,
> > on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the
> > 32bit version with kde).
> > Now I have a few questions:
> > 1: When I boot there will be 4 linux entrys with the k
On Du, 23 dec 12, 00:51:51, Thore wrote:
> Hello,
> on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the
> 32bit version with kde).
> Now I have a few questions:
> 1: When I boot there will be 4 linux entrys with the kernel name.
> one ending ...-4-686-pae (or like this) ando one with a
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
> Le 23.12.2012 00:51, Thore a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> on my Alienware m15x Notebook I installed debian wheezy (in the 32bit
>> version with kde).
>
> Hum, knowing that it is an alienware say nothing about the processor
> model, so maybe the 32bit choice is not
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Is anyone using an ASUS F1A75-M LE motherboard?
> Unfortunately upgrading to Wheezy or later is a complete fail.
> ...
> characters being displayed but then the display switches into a ~60%
> snow ~40% white and becomes unusable. To be clear this is the vt
> console. This is n
53 matches
Mail list logo