On 07/10/2019 11.08, DAVID HAND wrote:
> This is present in Buster and Stretch - can't remember precisely when it
> broke.
>
> Don't know which package maintainer is responsible, have searched a lot and
> found many similar sounding issues yet not been able to fix it myself, nor
> find active
This is present in Buster and Stretch - can't remember precisely when it broke.
Don't know which package maintainer is responsible, have searched a lot and
found many similar sounding issues yet not been able to fix it myself, nor find
active similar bug. Possibly one filed with glx-alternative
> I don't care whether or not they are supported in
> linux-firmware-nonfree; I want this to work using 100% free software.
I have linux-firmware-nonfree installed here on my desktop based on
a E350. It's not even for 3D (which I never use), but it was needed
just to get console output, IIRC.
I
The newer Richland APUs also should work, topping out with the A10-6800k.
As for the GPU, I don't expect 3d will work w/o the binary firmware blobs.
Even 2d might not work. And even if it does, there is still non-free video-
bios on the apu, AIUI. (There certainly is on all discreet radeon card
se CPUs comes with an AGPU (AKA APU), which is sort
of what it sounds like: A CPU with a GPU. What I'm wondering is how
these AGPUs will be supported by free software.
What is the freedom status of these AGPUs? Can I get 3D acceleration
in Debian using both DFSG-free drivers *and* firmware
you get any gain:
2.1.4. Dependency booting
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#dependency-boot
If you still experience a slow booting, review your logs to find out
the culprit.
> 3) I have nVidia Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT] display card. Now 3D
>
gt; to 1.0.20 (I've just been through this process for firmware for a different
> card, and it works fine).
>
> Sorry I can't help with your other issues :-(
>
> --
> Dom
>
>
Check out the wiki page [1] for nvidia drivers, a lot has changed with
the free driver mo
On 17/05/11 13:53, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
Yesterday I updated Lenny to Squeeze. Lenny was working very well, but
now I have a few problems:
2) sound no longer works. I have Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev
08), which seems to need firmware loaded. I tried installing ld10k1,
remains to check
│
│ r8169: rtl_nic/rtl8168d-2.fw, rtl_nic/rtl8168d-1.fw
I do not understand the above at all.
3) I have nVidia Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT] display card. Now 3D
acceleration no longer works, I managed to fix the wrong symlinks
probably caused by manually installed NVidia drivers 3 years ago. Now
On 03/31/2011 10:08 AM, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:49:14PM +, Camaleón wrote:
And provided you seem to be using a recent -and customized?- kernel
(Linux yoda 2.6.37-2-amd64) and also an updated Xorg server (1.9.5)
upgrading any of those components does not make much se
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:08:57 +0200, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:49:14PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> The more data you provide, the better for other people can tell you
>> some hints :-)
> :D
> sur enough, ok i am running enlightement .16 as desktopmanager, without
>
On 03/31/2011 03:36 AM, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:28:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:05:13 +0200, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
You will need to find out why the intel driver fails to load and Xorg
fallbacks to vesa or fb mode, if that's what is really happeni
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:49:14PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> And provided you seem to be using a recent -and customized?- kernel
> (Linux yoda 2.6.37-2-amd64) and also an updated Xorg server (1.9.5)
> upgrading any of those components does not make much sense, right?
yes the standard kernel coming
or fb mode, if that's what is really happening here.
> hmmm indeed reading the log i don't think that's happening
Yep... at least to me there is no clear error showing in the log :-?
(neither warnings nor problems for enabling 3D acceleration).
And provided you seem to be
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:28:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:05:13 +0200, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> You will need to find out why the intel driver fails to load and Xorg
> fallbacks to vesa or fb mode, if that's what is really happening here.
hmmm indeed reading the log i don'
with intel integrated graphics, worked out of
> the box
>
> but this time i have only basic services working (basic VGA mode) so no
> DRI, no 3D acceleration
>
> how do i get this working?
>
> processor is Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
>
> thanks!
>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:28:02 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:05:13 +0200, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
(...)
>> how do i get this working?
>
> You will need to find out why the intel driver fails to load and Xorg
> fallbacks to vesa or fb mode, if that's what is really happening here.
ated graphics, worked out of
> the box
>
> but this time i have only basic services working (basic VGA mode) so no
> DRI, no 3D acceleration
>
> how do i get this working?
You will need to find out why the intel driver fails to load and Xorg
fallbacks to vesa or fb mo
c services working (basic VGA mode) so no
DRI, no 3D acceleration
how do i get this working?
processor is Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
thanks!
--
ciao bboett
==
bbo...@adlp.org
http://inforezo.u-strasbg.
Thank You for Your time and answer, Andrei:
> Try first with the kernel from stable. If it doesn't work you can
> attach the full Xorg.0.log (maybe gzipped if the difference is
> significant).
Well... it did work... So, no option for me (w/ new kernel)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-
On Lu, 15 nov 10, 20:33:27, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Andrei:
>
> > Pure or do you have any packages from backports or so (especially
> > kernel)? Please also post the complete /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>
> That's what I have from backports, kernel included:
...
> linux-im
Thank You for Your time and answer, Andrei:
> Pure or do you have any packages from backports or so (especially
> kernel)? Please also post the complete /var/log/Xorg.0.log
That's what I have from backports, kernel included:
dictionaries-common
firmware-linux-free
iceweasel
libcairo2
libdbus-gl
On Lu, 15 nov 10, 12:53:16, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Andrei:
>
> > I don't see any errors here, please post the output of
>
> Yea, there is no error, but for some reason You saw after xserver
> has turned it on, it turns it off. Is it because I have second monitor
>
Thank You for Your time and answer, Andrei:
> I don't see any errors here, please post the output of
Yea, there is no error, but for some reason You saw after xserver
has turned it on, it turns it off. Is it because I have second monitor
connected?
> glxinfo | grep rendering
Here it is:
direct
On Du, 14 nov 10, 23:38:58, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I'm fighting w/ 3D acceleration on my new installation and have such
> DRM related items in the X log file:
I don't see any errors here, please post the output of
glxinfo | grep rendering
(glxinfo is in package
Good day.
I'm fighting w/ 3D acceleration on my new installation and have such
DRM related items in the X log file:
...
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:05.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK)
...
(II) RADEON(0): [dri] Foun
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:49:58PM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
From http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIRadeon :
Current status as of 09/2008:
* Radeon 7000 - X1950: well supported in both 2D and 3D by the
free drivers (ie. Radeon driver 6.9.0 and Mesa 7.2)
* Radeon X2000 - X4870: work in 2
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 02:32, Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:11:42AM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>>
>> It seems like bad policy to recommend closed drivers
>> if the open driver may work :-)
>
> Well, I'm looking for a new PCIe video card. My old card is one w
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:11:42AM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
It seems like bad policy to recommend closed drivers
if the open driver may work :-)
Well, I’m looking for a new PCIe video card. My old card is one with
NVidia chip (GV-N68128DH Silentpipe). Since I would prefer open drivers
as w
On 2008/12/1, Kelly wrote:
[snip]
> I am using Sid's Radeon (not HD) 6.9.0+git20081012.c0e6cb6d-1
> with Xorg 7.4 and Mesa 7.2. I have been using Radeon for a while,
> I think since at least Radeon 6.9.0, Mesa 7.0 and Xorg 7.3.
>
> Some relevant bits from my xorg.conf (I temporarily
> have a dif
the most recent driver that supports your card (8.10 does
>>>>> support X1200 but I'm not sure about 8.11). Remove the old drivers and
>>>>> install this one and your 3D acceleration should start working.
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jonathan
&g
e you mean a Mobility Radeon X1200 card. You can go to the ATI
>>>> site here:
>>>> http://ati.amd.com/support/driver.html
>>>> and get the most recent driver that supports your card (8.10 does
>>>> support X1200 but I'm not sure about 8.11
to the ATI
>>> site here:
>>> http://ati.amd.com/support/driver.html
>>> and get the most recent driver that supports your card (8.10 does support
>>> X1200 but I'm not sure about 8.11). Remove the old drivers and install
>>> this one and your 3D accelera
nt driver that supports your card (8.10 does support
>> X1200 but I'm not sure about 8.11). Remove the old drivers and install
>> this one and your 3D acceleration should start working.
>> Cheers,
>> Jonathan
>
>
> It seems like bad policy to recommend close
0 but I'm not sure about 8.11). Remove the old drivers and install this
> one and your 3D acceleration should start working.
> Cheers,
> Jonathan
It seems like bad policy to recommend closed drivers
if the open driver may work :-)
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
ng in the video.
>
> However, I cannot get hardware 3D acceleration to
> work. I get the following console message when running
> glxgears/info:
>
> unknown chip id 0x791e, can't guess.
> libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs.
> libGL error: InitDriver failed
&g
Slim Joe wrote:
> I'm using the onboard graphics of my Asus M2A-VM
> motherboard, which is identified as a Radeon X1200
> (RS690). XVideo works with the default open-source drivers,
> although there's noticeable tearing in the video.
>
> However, I cannot get hardwa
I'm using the onboard graphics of my Asus M2A-VM
motherboard, which is identified as a Radeon X1200
(RS690). XVideo works with the default open-source drivers,
although there's noticeable tearing in the video.
However, I cannot get hardware 3D acceleration to
work. I get the followi
I'm using the onboard graphics of my Asus M2A-VM
motherboard, which is identified as a Radeon X1200
(RS690). XVideo works with the default open-source drivers,
although there's noticeable tearing in the video.
However, I cannot get hardware 3D acceleration to
work. I get the followi
>> Has anyone had any success with 3d acceleration using fglrx on Debian?
>>
>> I'm currently on Debian testing, with kernel 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP. This
>> is an Ati X-1400 card. I have 2d with fglrx but not 3d. I tried the
I have a x800 XL Card and works pretty goo
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:18:12 +0100
Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone had any success with 3d acceleration using fglrx on Debian?
>
> I'm currently on Debian testing, with kernel 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP. This
> is an Ati X-1400 card. I have 2d with fg
Has anyone had any success with 3d acceleration using fglrx on Debian?
I'm currently on Debian testing, with kernel 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP. This
is an Ati X-1400 card. I have 2d with fglrx but not 3d. I tried the
Debian packages with module-assistant and also the installer supplied by
AMD
What is the contents of your configuration file /etc/X11/xorg.conf ?
Also a look into the X log file /var/log/Xorg.0.log might help.
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Would it be possible that you could tell me how to get the 3D
> acceleration operational so that I can use the whole potential of the
> Notebook?
Perhaps at http://dri.freedesktop.org you'll find some helpful hints.
There's details on http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/07 06:26, bart hendriks wrote:
> Dear Madam, Dear Sir,
>
> I have a question concerning 3D acceleration on my Dell Inspiron
> 1501 AMD64 with a Radeon Xpress 1150 3D-capable Graphics card.
> Currently I am using Debian Etch 6
Dear Madam,
Dear Sir,
I have a question concerning 3D acceleration on my Dell Inspiron 1501 AMD64
with a Radeon Xpress 1150 3D-capable Graphics card. Currently I am using Debian
Etch 64 installed via Netinstaller. This went perfect and all went smooth.
Now I installed the FlightGear Simulator
Controller Hub] (rev 03)
> > :00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82810E
> > DC-133 CGC [Chipset Graphics Controller] (rev 03)
> > I am wondering how to configure the video card for 3D acceleration,
> > and, in general, faster rendering. I know very little
1AA IDE (rev 02)
> :00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801AA USB (rev 02)
> :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801AA SMBus (rev 02)
> :01:09.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev
> 09) :01:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Accton Technology Cor
: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev 09)
:01:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Accton Technology Corporation
SMC2-1211TX (rev 10)
I am wondering how to configure the video card for 3D acceleration,
and, in general, faster rendering. I know very little about video
cards (as is probably seen by this email
On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:33,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >There are debian packages which are more up-to-date than those sited
> > above. Add to your sources.list:
> >#new DRI locations?
> >deb http://www.nixnuts.net/files/ ./
> >deb-src http://www.nixnuts.net/files/ ./
> >
> >There are thre
n 5.0 seconds = 120.000 FPS
I think I am close to achieving 3d acceleration, but not quite there yet
(unless this is the best a Mach 64 video card can do). If people have
any further hints on getting 3d acceleration for a Mach 64 ATI rage pro,
I definitely appreciate it.
Below is the result o
2004. január 17. 22:41 dátummal Bijan Soleymani ezt írta:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:11:51PM +0100, LeVA wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have an ati radeon 9200 card, and want to use it's 3d
> > acceleration.
> >
> > Programs, which needs 3d acceleration (tu
2004. január 17. 22:49 dátummal Roberto Sanchez ezt írta:
> LeVA wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have an ati radeon 9200 card, and want to use it's 3d
> > acceleration.
> >
> > Info:
> >
> > o XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2)
> >
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:11:51PM +0100, LeVA wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an ati radeon 9200 card, and want to use it's 3d acceleration.
>
> Programs, which needs 3d acceleration (tuxracer, unreal tournament) are
> very slow, but that glxgears program tells me, that it runs
LeVA wrote:
Hi!
I have an ati radeon 9200 card, and want to use it's 3d acceleration.
Info:
o XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2)
- radeon drm as module (from the Xdrm.tgz package, source)
XFree86 4.3 from experimental will do just fine, unless you would
rather use the binary
Hi!
I have an ati radeon 9200 card, and want to use it's 3d acceleration.
Info:
o XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2)
- radeon drm as module (from the Xdrm.tgz package, source)
o Driver from the ati's hp 3.7.0
- fglrx (xfree driver, and kernel module by that name)
> > One similar problem I encountered was that agpgart must be loaded
> > before the radeon module. Just get out of X, manually unload the
> > radeon module, make sure agpgart is loaded, then start X back up
> > (it will automatically load the radeon module again), and see what
> > happens.
>
> Th
Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 23:01, Lucas Bergman wrote:
One similar problem I encountered was that agpgart must be loaded
before the radeon module. Just get out of X, manually unload the
radeon module, make sure agpgart is loaded, then start X back up (it
will automatically load
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 23:01, Lucas Bergman wrote:
> One similar problem I encountered was that agpgart must be loaded
> before the radeon module. Just get out of X, manually unload the
> radeon module, make sure agpgart is loaded, then start X back up (it
> will automatically load the radeon modul
quot; in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, loaded the "radeon"
kernel module, and played with a couple of other settings), I haven't
been able to get 3D acceleration to work. These are the relevant lines
from the output of glxinfo, as I understand:
What kernel are you running?
-Roberto
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ti" in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, loaded the "radeon"
> kernel module, and played with a couple of other settings), I
> haven't been able to get 3D acceleration to work. These are the
> relevant lines from the output of glxinfo, as I understand:
>
> direct rendering: No
>
86Config-4, loaded the "radeon"
kernel module, and played with a couple of other settings), I haven't
been able to get 3D acceleration to work. These are the relevant lines
from the output of glxinfo, as I understand:
direct rendering: No
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
while g
Hello Roberto again;
Have rebooted and sorted out PC regarding to the new kernel - it loads
the AGPGART module and detects the G550 card no problem. Still OpenGL
doesn't work on both heads of the G550, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glxgears
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
[EMA
Piers Kittel wrote:
Hello Roberto;
> nForce2 GART support is in 2.4.22 and newer kernels. The nVidia
> drivers have been modified (via a patch) to compile against 2.5.x and
> 2.6.x kernels. If you want I can email you the patch, or you can
> Goolge for it, or search the threads at nforcershq
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:01, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:07:12AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I try and take good notes setting things up, but all I have is
> > "doesn't work on secondary head". My memory is that I saw a reason
> > why it doesn't work on the seco
Hello Roberto;
> nForce2 GART support is in 2.4.22 and newer kernels. The nVidia
> drivers have been modified (via a patch) to compile against 2.5.x and
> 2.6.x kernels. If you want I can email you the patch, or you can
> Goolge for it, or search the threads at nforcershq.com.
Aha. Got a bit co
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:07:12AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I try and take good notes setting things up, but all I have is "doesn't
> work on secondary head". My memory is that I saw a reason why it
> doesn't work on the secondary head but my Googling isn't finding that
> right now. O
Piers Kittel wrote:
Hello Marc,
> Don't know a thing about Quake... Quake puts me to sleep. Can't see
> it as anything but a good thing that it doesn't work for you.
Heh... was using it as an example OpenGL - that was before someone told
me about glxgears.
> Ewww... framebuffer. Shoot i
Hello Marc,
> Don't know a thing about Quake... Quake puts me to sleep. Can't see
> it as anything but a good thing that it doesn't work for you.
Heh... was using it as an example OpenGL - that was before someone told
me about glxgears.
> Ewww... framebuffer. Shoot immediately with extreme
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:57:56PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > Bill, Fair enough, but it doesn't work on both heads, not just one.
>
> You should get accelerated OGL on both heads.
I try and take good notes setting things up, but all I have is "doesn't
work on secondary head". My memory is
Hmmm, alright, here's what it looks like to me . . .
What you are seeing with the framebuffer stuff is for the console.
That's what allows your console to print its text. When you load X it
is not loading the modules or it can't find them.
To find out whether there is support in the kernel, you
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:52:54PM +, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Marc - here's the Quake 3 error on the G550:
> Sys_Error: GLimp_Init() - could not load OpenGL subsystem
> But works fine on the TNT2
Don't know a thing about Quake... Quake puts me to sleep. Can't see it as
anything but a good thing
To Aaron, Marc and Bill,
Marc - here's the Quake 3 error on the G550:
Sys_Error: GLimp_Init() - could not load OpenGL subsystem
But works fine on the TNT2
Bill, Fair enough, but it doesn't work on both heads, not just one.
Aaron;
How do I check if its compiled in the kernel? I think it seems
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:18:44PM +, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Strange - as I've got 2 graphics cards and 3 monitors, an el cheapo TNT2
> and the G550. The desktop "on" the TNT2 shows OpenGL applications just
> fine, but the desktops "on" the G550 won't show OpenGL applications,
I've got a G
Hello,
Sure. Make sure that whatever kernel you're using has support built for
it, load the module, and start up X. Make sure you're loading the dri
module.
Strange - as I've got 2 graphics cards and 3 monitors, an el cheapo TNT2
and the G550. The desktop "on" the TNT2 shows OpenGL application
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:36:15AM +, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Does anyone know how to enable 3D acceleration / Open GL for my Matrox
> G550 AGP using Debian?
Sure. Make sure that whatever kernel you're using has support built for
it, load the module, and start up X. Make sure you
Hello all
Does anyone know how to enable 3D acceleration / Open GL for my Matrox
G550 AGP using Debian?
Thanks very much for your help in advance
Cheers - Piers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 14:59, Jeremy Brooks wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a Thinkpad A31, which uses the Radeon mobility graphics chip. I
> have installed testing, in order to get an X server that works with this
> adapter.
Is this the radeon 7500? If so, it works well under xfree86 4.2 (4.1
had probl
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 11:59:22AM -0700, Jeremy Brooks wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a Thinkpad A31, which uses the Radeon mobility graphics chip. I
> have installed testing, in order to get an X server that works with this
> adapter.
you'll want a newer radeon driver, I think
you can go to http://ww
Hi,
I have a Thinkpad A31, which uses the Radeon mobility graphics chip. I
have installed testing, in order to get an X server that works with this
adapter.
I have googled and searched list archives, and can't think of anything
else to do.
Kernel is 2.4.20, with CONFIG_DRM=y, CONFIG_DRM_NEW=
27;t find any agp bridge :(
when loading X are you using the driver for your card and NOT the
framebuffer driver? The only limited experience I have with framebuffer
is on SuSE systems.. I had a SuSE 7.3 system a while back dual p2-233
with a Voodoo3 2000. It used framebuffer, and 3D acceleration was
I tried to boot up with the framebuffer and enabling the direct rendering
features for my ATI after recompiling the kernel. If i compile the framebuffer
thing into the kernel, boot up with the vga=XXX mode, the framebuffer works
great. But my system can't find any agp bridge :(
If i don't compile
On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 18:48, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Christian Banik wrote:
>
> > i'm using SUSE Linux 8.0 but i will install Debian 3.0 final . Nvidia
> > offers RPM - Files for my graphic - card TNT 2 to activate the 3D
> > acceleration. I&#x
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Christian Banik wrote:
> i'm using SUSE Linux 8.0 but i will install Debian 3.0 final . Nvidia
> offers RPM - Files for my graphic - card TNT 2 to activate the 3D
> acceleration. I've heard that the RPM system is not compatibel with GNU
> / Debian.
i'm using SUSE Linux 8.0 but i will install Debian 3.0 final . Nvidia
offers RPM - Files for my graphic - card TNT 2 to activate the 3D
acceleration. I've heard that the RPM system is not compatibel with GNU
/ Debian. What can i do? Thanks Christian .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
* Erik Steffl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> for X 4.0.1 you need very recent kernel, either one of the pre 2.4 or
> 2.2.18 (that would be 'pre' as well), the howto for this combination is
> at debianplanet.
Sorry if this mail comes twice, but my last mail didn't seem to reach the list.
Hi.
I ha
* Erik Steffl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> for X 4.0.1 you need very recent kernel, either one of the pre 2.4 or
> 2.2.18 (that would be 'pre' as well), the howto for this combination is
> at debianplanet.
Hi.
I have configured X 4.0.1 to use hardware gl on my Voodoo3 as described in the
howto
Gryn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:36:18AM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > what kernel and what version of X? if its kernel 2.2 and Xfree 3 i can
> > help ive done countless installations.
>
> Ah yes, that would have ben prudent to include. I'm running 2.4.0-test10,
> and XFree86 4.0ish.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:55:43AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> debianplanet has a more than excellent tutorial on this.
>
Amazing, that worked (or seems to :) )! I guess I just picked the wrong
combination of packages. Thanks! (And thanks to others who also responded :)
).
Ciao,
-Gryn
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:36:18AM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> what kernel and what version of X? if its kernel 2.2 and Xfree 3 i can
> help ive done countless installations.
Ah yes, that would have ben prudent to include. I'm running 2.4.0-test10,
and XFree86 4.0ish. (woody)
-Gryn
ion I can find, and I'm trying to setup my
> machine to use 3d acceleration with my voodoo 3000. I'd prefer to use only
> use debian packages, so my question isn't exactly -how- to do this, but rather
> if it's possible! :)
>
> I've spent about 10 hours reading
Gryn wrote:
>
> Hellos,
>
> I'm reading all the documentation I can find, and I'm trying to setup my
> machine to use 3d acceleration with my voodoo 3000. I'd prefer to use only
> use debian packages, so my question isn't exactly -how- to do this, but rat
Hellos,
I'm reading all the documentation I can find, and I'm trying to setup my
machine to use 3d acceleration with my voodoo 3000. I'd prefer to use only
use debian packages, so my question isn't exactly -how- to do this, but rather
if it's possible! :)
I'v
I have an ATI [EMAIL PROTECTED] AGP video card (which basically has Rage Pro 3d
acceleration), and I'd like to know if there are 3d libraries for it.
XF86_Mach64 works great on it, if that helps. I'd like to get the Quake 3
demo, but it don't work unless I can get 3d accel working
>> "PQdA" == Pedro Quaresma de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PQdA> I have a Matrox Millennium G200 (8Mg) working in my computer,
PQdA> and I have a driver for it "xmatrox_2.2-1_i386.deb".
These are old 2D drivers for X. The SVGA server package found at
ftp.netgod.net (or in unstable) nativ
>Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:37:59 +0100
>From: Alisdair McDiarmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not at all a joke. I know right where on ATI's website where they say the
> 3D API for the mach64/mach128 cards is propriatery and private. On the
> other hand, I recently received email from ATI's marketing department
> which insinuates that the 'developers' (Xfree and/o
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, scratch wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm also looking for the G200 drivers. :> Unfortunately, I no longer have
> > my G200 machine, but I hope to be getting it again soon. Now to get OpenGL
> > drivers for my Mach64. ;>
>
> I presume tha
* Alisdair McDiarmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I heard that there are OpenGL drivers for the Matrox Millennium
> G200 available for Linux, but I've looked on www.matrox.com and
> everywhere else I can think of, and I can't find them anywhere.
> Does anyone know where they are?
Just two links
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm also looking for the G200 drivers. :> Unfortunately, I no longer have
> my G200 machine, but I hope to be getting it again soon. Now to get OpenGL
> drivers for my Mach64. ;>
I presume that last one was a joke. Or isn't it?
-- nico (i have a
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
