Re: SCSI device detection order

2007-08-13 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Paul Johnson wrote: I have a Firewire external hard drive, and recently with the upgrade to linux-image-2.6.22, my firewire block device has been detecting as sda instead of sdc, causing my machine to hang at boot if it is turned on. What can be done to resolve the detection order? This is e

SCSI device detection order

2007-08-12 Thread Paul Johnson
I have a Firewire external hard drive, and recently with the upgrade to linux-image-2.6.22, my firewire block device has been detecting as sda instead of sdc, causing my machine to hang at boot if it is turned on. What can be done to resolve the detection order? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: USB device detection problem

2003-03-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
help. > Everything USB works fine in linux afterwards (and > beforewards). There are no error messages, just a lack of > device detection messages. /proc/bus/usb/devices won't > show the drives when this happens, but all USB ports are > detected. > ctl-alt-del as bios is sc

USB device detection problem

2003-03-05 Thread Jack Pistachio
e no error messages, just a lack of device detection messages. /proc/bus/usb/devices won't show the drives when this happens, but all USB ports are detected. ctl-alt-del as bios is scanning for a bootable floppy does the trick, but a better solution should definately be had. -jackp note: M$ has n

Re: Device detection?

1999-03-24 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > I'm not sure I see why checkpointing every test should be particularly > slow. Michele Bini writes: > Because you have to wait after every test for the checkpoint to > be written to disk and the disk to be flushed A few milliseconds, according to my measurements. How many tests do we

Re: Device detection?

1999-03-23 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > I'm not sure I see why checkpointing every test should be particularly > slow. Michele Bini writes: > Because you have to wait after every test for the checkpoint to > be written to disk and the disk to be flushed I'm not convinced that has to all that slow. > and disk's builtin cach

Re: Device detection?

1999-03-23 Thread Michele Bini
On Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 08:38:56PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Rob Browning writes: > > > Presuming that most people won't have lockups, the overall inconvenience > > might be less this way, particularly if it dramatically cuts the time to > > run successful tests. > > I'm not sure I see why chec