Re: File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In , Albretch Mueller wrote: > ls -lR > > but not all timestamps are formatted the same. You get them as, say, >"Mar 24 2004", but also as "Dec 26 09:55" (without the year!) and they >are (or seem to be) files in the same directory > > Why would that be? From the Single Unix Specification version

Re: File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Carl Johnson
Chris Jackson writes: > Albretch Mueller wrote: > >> ~ >> ... or ls not properly displaying them in some cases. >> ~ >> I got this compressed file that seems to be the metadata snapshot of >> a file system you get by running: >> ~ >> ls -lR >> ~ >> but not all timestamps are formatted the sam

Re: File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Bob Proulx
Albretch Mueller wrote: > but not all timestamps are formatted the same. You get them as, say, > "Mar 24 2004", but also as "Dec 26 09:55" (without the year!) and they > are (or seem to be) files in the same directory > ~ > Why would that be? Because the original Unix ls command many years ago d

Re: File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Chris Jackson
Albretch Mueller wrote: > ~ > ... or ls not properly displaying them in some cases. > ~ > I got this compressed file that seems to be the metadata snapshot of > a file system you get by running: > ~ > ls -lR > ~ > but not all timestamps are formatted the same. You get them as, say, > "Mar 24 2

Re: File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Claudius Hubig
Albretch Mueller wrote: >~ > ... or ls not properly displaying them in some cases. >~ ^ I don’t even want to know what these are doing here… > but not all timestamps are formatted the same. You get them as, say, >"Mar 24 2004", but also as "Dec 26 09:55" (without the year!) and they >are (or see

Re: File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:41:38 +, Albretch Mueller wrote: > ~ > ... or ls not properly displaying them in some cases. > ~ > I got this compressed file that seems to be the metadata snapshot of > a file system you get by running: > ~ > ls -lR > ~ > but not all timestamps are formatted the sam

File systems' timestamps apparently formatted in a wrong way ...

2011-01-02 Thread Albretch Mueller
~ ... or ls not properly displaying them in some cases. ~ I got this compressed file that seems to be the metadata snapshot of a file system you get by running: ~ ls -lR ~ but not all timestamps are formatted the same. You get them as, say, "Mar 24 2004", but also as "Dec 26 09:55" (without the