Re: OT: Mutt checking files for new mail

2001-04-15 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:55:18PM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote: > Are you using exim as your smtp server? If so it may be worth checking > in MAIN CONFIGURATION SETTINGS and looking for > > # Have exim deliver all mail that's received in a single connection. > # Normally it will deliver the first

Re: OT: Mutt checking files for new mail

2001-04-15 Thread Brian Potkin
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:52:47AM -0400, Thomas J. Hamman wrote: > I use fetchmail, procmail, and mutt for my E-mail, and I'm having one > little issue with mutt that has been disturbing me for a while: > > Sometimes, new mail in my files does not show up in mutt for a while > (sometimes even a

Re: OT: Mutt checking files for new mail

2001-04-15 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:21:48PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > "For hours" is strange, using noflushd or so? Try "set timeout=10", > anyway. > > Andre Berger[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nope, not using flushd. I hadn't noticed the timeout variable before, though; I'll try

Re: OT: Mutt checking files for new mail

2001-04-15 Thread Andre Berger
* Thomas J. Hamman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-15 15:07 +0200: > Sometimes, new mail in my files does not show up in mutt for a while > (sometimes even a couple hours) after I have received it. > > Does this happen to anyone else? How can I fix it? "For hours" is strange, using noflushd or so?

OT: Mutt checking files for new mail

2001-04-15 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
I use fetchmail, procmail, and mutt for my E-mail, and I'm having one little issue with mutt that has been disturbing me for a while: Sometimes, new mail in my files does not show up in mutt for a while (sometimes even a couple hours) after I have received it. Does this happen to anyone else? Ho