On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
>>and certainly
>>not gmail.
>
> I found it in my gmail settings:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/16/08 00:38, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:33:43 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The most common MUAs (and all webmail) don't allow Reply-to to be set
to anything other than what the application thinks it should be.
Do you mean that MUAs don
;Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote
>>> about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/15/08 13:43
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Webmail and popular MUAs like Tbird and Lookout make it difficult to
> follow the no-CC "rule". Someone, though, has thoughtfully written a
> replytolist plugin for Tbird/Icedove. Get v0.3.0 unless you use IMAP,
> which requires you to use v0.2.1.
Huh, first time I ever
Ron Johnson wrote:
> It isn't that difficult to create Reply-to-List functionality.
Tell that to the TBird developers. We're going on, what, 4 years now and
counting? :(
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Oh, please. What the heck do you know about the forums I manage? I
> wasn't suggesting that Debian forums should set reply-to that way. I
> was merely pointing out that misdirected replies are not gmail's fault,
> but the user's.
It is certainly possible to correctly re
On Sunday 16 November 2008 04:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
> The ability to set the Reply-to Address serves no
> purpose to someone subscribed to mailing lists, and wants to easily
> reply to the list.
I find the easiest, mostly client-independent way to do that is to
Reply-To-All and then remove the e
On 11/16/08 01:53, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
and certainly
not gmail.
I found it in my gmail settings: Settings -> Accounts Tab -> Reply-to
Address (Optional)
I'm p
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
>and certainly
>not gmail.
I found it in my gmail settings: Settings -> Accounts Tab -> Reply-to
Address (Optional)
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,
On Saturday 15 November 2008, "Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html&l
On 11/16/08 01:20, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
As does Mutt, and probably Evolution. But not Tbird, and certainly
not gmail. Don't know about KMail.
I can vouch that KMail
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
>As does Mutt, and probably Evolution. But not Tbird, and certainly
>not gmail. Don't know about KMail.
I can vouch that KMail does. It might be a bit hard to find, but it&
On 11/16/08 00:38, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:33:43 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The most common MUAs (and all webmail) don't allow Reply-to to be
set to anything other than what the application thinks it should be.
Do you mean that MUAs don't allow the sender
On 11/16/08 00:43, Rob Starling wrote:
[snip]
a third line with that URL certainly wouldn't make my inbox
any more bloated. who are the admins who could do that?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hitler!!!
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 09:19:58PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Besides:
>
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
> When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send
> a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they
> explicitly request to be copied.
might it
On 11/16/08 00:30, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 21:13, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:33:43 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The most common MUAs (and all webmail) don't allow Reply-to to be
> set to anything other than what the application thinks it should be.
Do you mean that MUAs don't allow the sender to set a custom Reply-to?
Sylphee
On 11/15/08 22:26, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008, "Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 P
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 21:13, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they
requested it. Is that correct?
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 15 November 2008, "Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008, "Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
> >On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PR
On 11/15/08 21:21, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless t
On Saturday 15 November 2008, "Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> I was fairly s
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
>> I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
>> mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they requested it.
>> Is that correct
On 11/15/08 21:13, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they
requested it. Is that correct?
Yup.
I only ask bec
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they
requested it. Is that correct?
Yup.
I only ask because I've been getting a lot of CCs rec
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they requested
it. Is that correct?
Yup.
I only ask because I've been getting a lot of CCs recently and I really,
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they requested
it. Is that correct?
I only ask because I've been getting a lot of CCs recently and I really,
really don't want them. I check the list every time I c
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
