"Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then there was the issue with not getting found. It was located in
> /usr/include/db1 but I had to explicitly specify that dir with
> --site-includes, which I thought was a bit strange.
That is because the glibc maintainers have decide to move to db2
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 05:12:15PM -0500, Stephen R. Gore wrote:
> > BTW, where is this port 1024 specified for WDM ? Just
> > curious.
>
> I don't even know if it IS specified. I got the info like
> this:
Daemons that run stand-alone do not need a file like
/etc/inetd.conf to specify on which po
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote:
> You are right. I am using WDM. BTW, where is this port 1024 specified
> for WDM ? Just curious.
using a bind(2) call in the program source code.
[]s,
Mario O.de Menezes"Many are the plans in a man's heart, but
IPEN-CNEN/SP
Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > "Stephen" == Stephen R Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen> On my system wdm runs on port 1024. I don't know if you are
> Stephen> running wdm, but I would suspect that xdm and gdm use the same
> Stephen> port. YMMV.
>
> You are right. I am using WDM
> "Stephen" == Stephen R Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> On my system wdm runs on port 1024. I don't know if you are
Stephen> running wdm, but I would suspect that xdm and gdm use the same
Stephen> port. YMMV.
You are right. I am using WDM. BTW, where is this port 1024 s
Salman Ahmed wrote:
> (3) What service is running on port 1024 ? I grepped /etc/services and
> there was no such port 1024 listed in there ?
---end quoted text---
On my system wdm runs on port 1024. I don't know if you are running wdm,
but I would suspect that xdm and gdm use the same port. Y
> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> What struggle? XEmacs should compile on a typical Debian system,
Jan> just using
What I meant by that was that I didn't have all the dev libraries installed
so, after installing a couple and trying make it would later bomb on so
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:01:15PM +0200, Jan Vroonhof wrote:
> localhost still have access). I think you are more or less safe as
> long as you don't do stupid things with xhosts.
xhost + anyone?
> > (6) I'd like to be able to respond to a port scan attempt in real-time,
> > and possibly st
"Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> them. The reason I hadn't noticed them when they were happening because
> I was in another workspace and was struggling to get XEmacs to compile
> from source.
What struggle? XEmacs should compile on a typical Debian system, just
using
./configure
mak
> "Nathan" == Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nathan> RTFM /etc/services to find out what auth is, and RTFM
Nathan> `host http.us.debian.org'. I'm tired of people complaining
Nathan> about "hack attempts" from pavlov on the auth port. Please,
Nathan> buy, steal, o
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote:
[ snip ]
: Oct 2 20:59:12 phoenix tcplogd: auth connection attempt from
: pavlov.midco.net [24.220.0.13]
RTFM /etc/services to find out what auth is, and RTFM `host
http.us.debian.org'. I'm tired of people complaining about "hack
attem
First off, my apologies if this email is considered off-topic. The
reason I am posting to this list about this subject is because I
have received excellent help and support in the past from other
debian users.
Just yesterday I noticed in one of my log files a number of connection
attempts to my b
12 matches
Mail list logo
