Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?

Dne, 08. 06. 2010 17:49:56 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a): However, squid is capable of caching much more data than fits into RAM. Thanx. Must definitely read up on that (when I find the time). -- Regards, Klistvud Certifiable Loonix User #481801 http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com

Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?

On Sunday 06 June 2010 08:38:47 Klistvud wrote: > Do you think there would be any point in > optimizing the squid.conf MEMORY CACHE OPTIONS (such as cache_mem, > maximum_object_size_in_memory and memory_replacement_policy), or would > it just "duplicate" the caching provided by the kernel? I mean,

Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?

Dne, 06. 06. 2010 15:38:47 je Klistvud napisal(a): Bump! -- Regards, Klistvud Certifiable Loonix User #481801 http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Arc

Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?

Howdie, fellow Debianites! Looking for some input on the following dilemma: I'm running a small home-LAN squid3 server with 1 GB disk cache and trying to optimize its performance. The Lenny machine running it has 2.5 Gigs of RAM, of which more than 1.5 Gigs is being used as cache (as shown