Rick Macdonald wrote:
George Bonser wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell
dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always
been afraid to do that.
Yes, you can do that.
Tommy wrote:
When I upgraded the package lists of
stable, unstable, contrib, and non-free dselect ...
This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell
dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always
been afraid to do that.
--
...RickM...
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 08:01:43PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell
dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always
been afraid to do that.
Yes, you can do
George Bonser wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell
dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always
been afraid to do that.
Yes, you can do that. Just make sure you go in the
George Bonser wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Does it merge stable and unstable and just show the newest version of
each package,
Yes.
or keep them separate so I can choose?
No
Hmmm, that doesn't seem much different than if you just define unstable,
except for
George Bonser wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Hmmm, that doesn't seem much different than if you just define unstable,
except for packages that are only in one or the other. The intersection
of stable and unstable would just be the same as unstable anyway. Right?
For
Rick Macdonald wrote:
Tommy wrote:
When I upgraded the package lists of
stable, unstable, contrib, and non-free dselect ...
This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell
dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always
been afraid to do
7 matches
Mail list logo
