Greetings everyone. I'm having a problem trying to install debconf.
I just did a full upgrade to potato this evening. I then tried to
install a new package (everybuddy) that relied on debconf. When
apt-get went to install debconf I got the error:
HAL9000:/var/cache/apt/archives# dpkg -i
I am getting almost exactly the same error, except mine is as follows:
tsuess:~# apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
28 packages not fully
so am i but mine is with apache-common
-- Nathan York
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Todd Suess wrote:
I am getting almost exactly the same error, except mine is as follows:
tsuess:~# apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Todd Suess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preparing to replace debconf 0.2.60 (using .../debconf_0.2.65_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement debconf ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/debconf_0.2.65_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preparing to replace debconf 0.2.60 (using .../debconf_0.2.65_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement debconf ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/debconf_0.2.65_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite directory `/usr/sbin' in package sudo with nondirectory
On Sáu, 07 Giêng 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preparing to replace debconf 0.2.60 (using .../debconf_0.2.65_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement debconf ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/debconf_0.2.65_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite directory
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 11:30:17PM -0600, Ashley Clark wrote:
It's an easy fix to fix it, in the Makefile of the source, one line
has bin where it should say sbin
But in the debconf_0.2.65_all.deb there is a *file* named /user/sbin - it's
a shell script to be precise. And what the system is
On Sáu, 07 Giêng 2000, Mike Werner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 11:30:17PM -0600, Ashley Clark wrote:
It's an easy fix to fix it, in the Makefile of the source, one line
has bin where it should say sbin
But in the debconf_0.2.65_all.deb there is a *file* named /user/sbin - it's
a shell
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 12:10:17AM -0600, Ashley Clark wrote:
Yes, the /usr/sbin file is one of two that should actually be in
/usr/sbin, by changing the line in the Makefile, it creates the
directory and when creating the deb file, places in it two files,
dpkg-preconfig and dpkg-reconfigure.
debconf (0.2.66) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed typo that was making a sbin file
-- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:34:56 -0800
In Incoming and http://kitenet.net/programs/debs.cgi#debconf
--
see shy jo
I am getting almost exactly the same error, except mine is as follows:
tsuess:~# apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
28 packages not fully
I gather the offending debconf package has now been fixed, however, for
the future if you delete the file from /var/cache/apt/archives, come
off-line and use the -m option to apt-get, it will install and configure
the remaining packages. -m effectively means 'ignore any packges not
available'.
12 matches
Mail list logo