Re: java for jabref

2006-01-07 Thread Andy Streich
> >> Please, what is the common way for java development under debian sarge? > >> > >> Is it better to develop under solaris > >> and simply run and test it under debian ? > >> > >> netbeans and eclipse are both open source, so they should qualify > >> for debian. I'm using Netbeans 4.1 from:

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-07 Thread Morten Gulbrandsen
Linas Zvirblis wrote: Please, what is the common way for java development under debian sarge? Is it better to develop under solaris and simply run and test it under debian ? netbeans and eclipse are both open source, so they should qualify for debian. Eclipse 3.1 is already in Debian U

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-07 Thread Linas Zvirblis
Please, what is the common way for java development under debian sarge? Is it better to develop under solaris and simply run and test it under debian ? netbeans and eclipse are both open source, so they should qualify for debian. Eclipse 3.1 is already in Debian Unstable. I was pretty sur

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-07 Thread Morten Gulbrandsen
Ryan Nowakowski wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:49:47PM +0100, Morten Gulbrandsen wrote: is this the next way ? http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/142 Yes Hello Ryan, hello List readers and subscribers! Thanx, it is done and it works, both for mozilla and K

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-06 Thread Ryan Nowakowski
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:49:47PM +0100, Morten Gulbrandsen wrote: > is this the next way ? > > http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/142 > Yes signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-06 Thread Morten Gulbrandsen
Ryan Nowakowski wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:40:22PM +0100, Morten Gulbrandsen wrote: Ryan Nowakowski wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:21:51PM +, michael wrote: mm... not sure which Java SDK is required for this... the Debian/Java FAQ just confuses me!

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-06 Thread Ryan Nowakowski
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:40:22PM +0100, Morten Gulbrandsen wrote: > Ryan Nowakowski wrote: > > >On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:21:51PM +, michael wrote: > > > > > >mm... not sure which Java SDK is required for this... the Debian/Java > >FAQ just confuses me! > > > > > >

Re: java for jabref

2006-01-06 Thread Morten Gulbrandsen
Ryan Nowakowski wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:21:51PM +, michael wrote: mm... not sure which Java SDK is required for this... the Debian/Java FAQ just confuses me! Yeah, Java yuck. I agree. There are two programs that are so good it was worth it to me to install Java: j

Re: java for jabref

2005-12-28 Thread Ryan Nowakowski
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:21:51PM +, michael wrote: > > > > mm... not sure which Java SDK is required for this... the Debian/Java > > > > FAQ just confuses me! > > > > > > Yeah, Java yuck. I agree. There are two programs that are so good it was > > > worth it to me to install Java: jabref a

Re: java for jabref

2005-12-24 Thread S. Sakar
michael schrieb: mm... not sure which Java SDK is required for this... the Debian/Java FAQ just confuses me! >>> >>>Yeah, Java yuck. I agree. There are two programs that are so good it was >>>worth it to me to install Java: jabref and jbidwatcher. They are both the >>>best in their area.

Re: java for jabref

2005-12-24 Thread Richard Lyons
On Saturday, 24 December 2005 at 17:21:51 +, michael wrote: [...] > > sorry if being a bit dense here but how do I get "blackdown" packages? A > search on Debian packages reveals nothing connected... but a quick google gives http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux -- richard -- To UNSUBSCRI

java for jabref

2005-12-24 Thread michael
> > > mm... not sure which Java SDK is required for this... the Debian/Java > > > FAQ just confuses me! > > > > Yeah, Java yuck. I agree. There are two programs that are so good it was > > worth it to me to install Java: jabref and jbidwatcher. They are both the > > best in their area. Jbidwat