On 25 Aug 2006, T wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:45:49 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>
>
> I totally agree. apt-get is sufficient.
>
> If you worry about the unneeded packages, then use deborphan. I use it
> every time I install or un-install packages. no hassle at all.
>
> I never use aptitu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:41:03PM +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
>> T wrote:
>>> If you worry about the unneeded packages, then use deborphan. I use it
>>> every time I install or un-install packages. no hassle at all.
>> The onl
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:41:03PM +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
>
> T wrote:
> >
> >If you worry about the unneeded packages, then use deborphan. I use it
> >every time I install or un-install packages. no hassle at all.
>
> The only problem with this is that, IIRC, deborphan is deprecated in
> sid/e
Wackojacko wrote:
> hopefully kpackage can be made to use aptitude in the future!
It is called adept and its not-yet-100%-stable version is already in
Debian/{unstable,testing}
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EM
T wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:45:49 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
} > That's your problem. aptitude sucks.
}
} I always use something like "aptitude install -t version xxx". Aptitude
} remembers reverse dependencies, hence aptitude purge xxx will remove xxx
} and all it's deps, apt-get
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:45:49 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> } > That's your problem. aptitude sucks.
> }
> } I always use something like "aptitude install -t version xxx". Aptitude
> } remembers reverse dependencies, hence aptitude purge xxx will remove xxx
> } and all it's deps, apt-get won't
6 matches
Mail list logo
