On ke, 2007-08-08 at 18:47 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The main issue from where I sit is allowing enough time for nominees
> to post position statements and to have enough time for those position
> statements digested by the electorate, and enough initial discussion
> to occur so that interestin
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> The organisers and most time slot limitations could be identified
> before nominations close and the possibilities announced. The
> organisers were already being identified before nominations closed
> this year, after all:-
The problem is really that figuring o
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:12:15 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Summary: reduce the campaign-only period to one week. [...]
>
> This would probably mean that organizing the debate might have
> to go; since the time period for identif
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:12:15 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This is an amendment to aj's proposal shown at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/07/msg00178.html
> AMENDMENT PROPOSAL Summary: reduce the campaign-only period
> to one week.
> The change to paragraph four
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All we would need is someone to combine the two, get enough seconds, and
> the combination of both ideas will appear on the ballot. So you would
> get four options, nicely matching the boolean table of the two
> ``independent'' options.
Yes, that
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:37 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:12 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
> > Summary: reduce the campaign-only period to one week.
> >
> > The change to paragraph four is replaced by:
> > 4. For [-three weeks-] {+one week+
Simon Richter wrote:
>
> Which will probably mean that we will need options for this amendment in
> combination with other amendments for voting. Does that need to be
> spelled out, will that just magically happen or is that the most stupid
> idea you have ever heard?
All we would need is someone
Hello,
MJ Ray wrote:
> AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
> Summary: reduce the campaign-only period to one week.
>
> The change to paragraph four is replaced by:
> 4. For [-three weeks-] {+one week+} after that no more candidates
>may be nominated; candidates should use this time for
>
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:12:15PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> This is an amendment to aj's proposal shown at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/07/msg00178.html
>
> AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
> Summary: reduce the campaign-only period to one week.
>
> The change to paragraph four is replace
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:12 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
> Summary: reduce the campaign-only period to one week.
>
> The change to paragraph four is replaced by:
> 4. For [-three weeks-] {+one week+} after that no more candidates
>may be nominated; candidates sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is an amendment to aj's proposal shown at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/07/msg00178.html
AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Summary: reduce the campaign-only period to one week.
The change to paragraph four is replaced by:
4. For [-thre
11 matches
Mail list logo
