On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:39:30PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Agustin Martin wrote:
> > IIRC, none of aspell or hunspell can handle pseudo-charsets like 'a or TeX
> > explicit chars \'a, \'{a}, while ispell can, if the aff file has them
> > declared, so there is no full replacement for ispell.
Agustin Martin wrote:
> IIRC, none of aspell or hunspell can handle pseudo-charsets like 'a or TeX
> explicit chars \'a, \'{a}, while ispell can, if the aff file has them
> declared, so there is no full replacement for ispell.
[could probably sound harsh, but isn't ment as such] i suggest to
disc
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:08:53AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > How about removing this obsolete package instead of just orphaning it? I
> > say "obsolete" because it didn't adapt to the fact that UTF-8 is the
> > preferred character encoding nowadays, and bette
How about removing this obsolete package instead of just orphaning it? I
say "obsolete" because it didn't adapt to the fact that UTF-8 is the
preferred character encoding nowadays, and better replacements exist
(e.g., "aspell -i"). See also #469016.
Yes, I know about the huge list of reverse de
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> How about removing this obsolete package instead of just orphaning it? I
> say "obsolete" because it didn't adapt to the fact that UTF-8 is the
> preferred character encoding nowadays, and better replacements exist
> (e.g., "aspell -i"). See also #469016.
the vers
5 matches
Mail list logo
