(forw) Re: Shorter URLs for the mail archive?

Hi, as discussed with Josip Rodin on IRC, I'm forwarding my ideas for the list archives URL to debian-www, and hope to get some answers about the ideas. If there are any open issues with that, please don't hesitate to ask me. Cheers, Andi - Forwarded message from Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROT

Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

Gerfried Fuchs writes: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail >> >>> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid or not, but it's surely not >>> a kdenetwork bug. >> >> notice that the "KDE network module" text on that page is grabbed >> from kmail package description. > And? What has th

Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

* Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:01]: > reassign 237171 kmail > severity 237171 minor > thanks Thanks, Riku, but no. Don't play ping pong with bugs if you are not sure whats going on. >>> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail > >> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid

Processed: Re: Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 237171 www.debian.org Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork" Bug reassigned from package `kmail' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Processed: Re: Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 237171 kmail Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork" Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `kmail'. > severity 237171 minor Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork" Severity se

Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

reassign 237171 kmail severity 237171 minor thanks > > On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported as > > "kdenetwork" (should be kdepim). > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail > I'm not sure whether this bug is valid or not, but it's surely not a > kdenetwork

Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

Riku Voipio writes: > reassign 237171 kmail severity 237171 minor thanks >> > On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported >> > as "kdenetwork" (should be kdepim). >> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail >> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid or not, but it's

Processed: Re: Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package kmail Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kmail > reassign 237171 www.debian.org Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork" Bug reassigned from package `kmail' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Re: Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"

package kmail reassign 237171 www.debian.org thanks Guillaume Pratte writes: > Package: kmail Version: 4:3.1.5-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid > On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported as > "kdenetwork" (should be kdepim). > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail

CVS account

Hi, My account in CVS is no longer valid. Maybe it's related to the security problem last year, I don't know, it's been over a year since I last used it (the main page doesn't change that often). Has anybody else had problems logging into cvs? Eduardo.