On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 14:46:23 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 2:1.17.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The xserver-xorg-core package fails to upgrade due to a file conflict
> with x11-common:
>
> Unpacking xserver-xorg-core (2:1.17.2-2) over (2:1.17.2-1.1) ...
>
On 01.09.2015 15:04, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 12.08.2015 01:13, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> No, the reverse dependencies don't need updating due to the transitional
>> packages. Over time they should be updated but there's no pressure to
>> rush it.
>
> Actually it's not true, the binary dependencies
Your message dated Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:34:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#779754: fixed in weston 1.8.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #779754,
regarding weston: Transition to libsystemd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:32:59 +0200
Source: weston
Binary: weston
Architecture: source
Version: 1.8.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
Changed-By: Hector Oron
Description:
weston
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.17.2-2
Severity: serious
The xserver-xorg-core package fails to upgrade due to a file conflict
with x11-common:
Unpacking xserver-xorg-core (2:1.17.2-2) over (2:1.17.2-1.1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xorg-core_2%3a1.
weston_1.8.0-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
weston_1.8.0-3.dsc
weston_1.8.0-3.diff.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Tag 'weston-1.8.0-3' created by Héctor Orón Martínez at
2015-09-01 12:21 +
Release Debian version weston-1.8.0-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAABCgAGBQJV5ZguAAoJEK8ig6p24qx7ysMP/0wcX4Q678knYyGWC9MPhNtf
W9GTWe9XMIhrHC1//Vrt0MUZY70nDlDDoph4RMO1bOSdcOQS0KD987Lo8kPxkLT7
zQNGIRyUL34+zOTWyN
debian/changelog|7
debian/control |2 -
debian/patches/0001-Add-suport-for-new-libsystemd.patch | 28
debian/patches/series |1
4 files changed,
On 12.08.2015 01:13, Robert Ancell wrote:
> No, the reverse dependencies don't need updating due to the transitional
> packages. Over time they should be updated but there's no pressure to
> rush it.
Actually it's not true, the binary dependencies would still be wrong and
to fix those rebuilds are
On 31.08.2015 23:10, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:08:14 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am deeply concerned about the news: it seems that Intel upcoming
>> Skylake CPUs will require a non-free binary-only firmware blob in order
>> for the integrated graphics to operate
10 matches
Mail list logo