Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-28 Thread Alexander Perry
Thanks, Karl, that is much neater than the way I was doing it. What I'm trying to set up is this ... The nameservers are all running xdm to catch broadcast xdmcp requests. These are given the chooser with a list of host names that is automatically derived from the nameserver content. Each

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-27 Thread Alexander Perry
Thanks, Karl, that is much neater than the way I was doing it. What I'm trying to set up is this ... The nameservers are all running xdm to catch broadcast xdmcp requests. These are given the chooser with a list of host names that is automatically derived from the nameserver content. Each

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-26 Thread Alexander Perry
From: Karl Hammar [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ man Xserver | sed -n -e '288,340p' Yes, I know. From: Alexander Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] I can do it by disabling it in xdm and putting a line in the inittab, but the authentication stuff is a pain and I'm assuming there must be a better way

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-25 Thread Alexander Perry
From: Karl Hammar [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ man Xserver | sed -n -e '288,340p' Yes, I know. From: Alexander Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] I can do it by disabling it in xdm and putting a line in the inittab, but the authentication stuff is a pain and I'm assuming there must be a better way

Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-24 Thread Alexander Perry
I know how to have xdm use the indirect and chooser features to work with external X terminals and determine where they go. Works great, but it leaves me with a simple question ... Is there a clean way to specify that the locally managed display should be indirected (like a terminal would be)

Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-24 Thread Alexander Perry
I know how to have xdm use the indirect and chooser features to work with external X terminals and determine where they go. Works great, but it leaves me with a simple question ... Is there a clean way to specify that the locally managed display should be indirected (like a terminal would be)

Can I just yank GLU out of Mesa ?

2000-08-21 Thread Alexander Perry
Much to my amazement, the XF401 phase 1 installed nicely (after using the --force-depends) on a new potato machine. Unfortunately, I haven't managed to take advantage of the DRI because most of the Mesa demos (and plib1) rely on having GLU available. Is there anything 'different' about the