* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
we'll want for squeeze, depending
Package: mesa
Version: 7.5-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
this is just a bug to keep the package from testing to migration now,
as it should go in only with a newer X.org (at least according to
datos file, which references a request from the maintainer). I'm going
to drop this block after this bug is a
that the project
nouveau is making progress, changes are merged back, and this driver is
better then the binary-only driver, I think keeping the driver in main
is the right decision.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
appreciated by etch users.
Approved.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on the new
xfonts-utils for the reverted debhelper script.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061230 10:57]:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061230 06:15]:
at the same time revert the debhelper change (#362820). All xfonts
using debhelper would then need (bin?)nmus to get maintainer scripts
without --x11r7-layout.
I don't think we're
.
So, my question is whether it would be sensible to setup some Debian
Fonts Team who could team-maintain these packages in a common
repository?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061114 14:35]:
A potential other issue is that paths for fonts and modules have changed
and thus changes in the X configuration file may be needed. Whether this
really is an issue depends on how well conversion of old X11 config files
is supported
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-xorg-video-nv to non-free, and xserver-xorg-video-all
to contrib (the source for a contrib package can still be in main).
IMHO, this is your call. What do you decide?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
, that makes it easier for me considering
it to be etch-ignore. I need to think about it.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if that happens (or rather
dpkg-genchanges), which isn't too hard to achive actually.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a more detailed look this evening.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it's our task to try to protect
the from such issues.
If it's not reasonable to support it in code, why not doing what the
submitter proposed - adding that information to the release notes. But
just ignoring it isn't IMHO the right thing.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
* Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 14:30]:
At Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:37:43 +1100,
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]:
Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 14:34]:
* Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 14:30]:
I experienced same case on my arm experimental buildd.
The problem of my case was caused by broken xfree86-common
(uninstallation failed). Andreas, did you check it?
I'll check the chroot
guidelines (and add some of
your own), and make the decision for yourself.
Total true. I have exactly the same opinion as Wouter on this topic.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
18 matches
Mail list logo
