Bug#272496: xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] power resume fails on iBook with Radeon Mobility M7 LW [regression from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4]

2007-01-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:21:48PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding power > resume failing on a iBook with a Radeon Mobility board. Did you > reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug in the > next

Re: xterm.deb build from Thomas E. Dickey's tree directly

2005-06-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > > I've tried to build new xterm.deb package from Thomas' tree last > > weekend. I think it is 1st step for pruning xterm from xorg-x11 orig > > tarball (it is listed in TODO list of xorg-x11) Why would you want to prune it from the tarball? Not building it makes lots

Re: Proposal on how to handle xorg include patches (WAS: Re: X Strike Force XOrg SVN commit: r28 - /)

2004-10-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > > | +| > | +|--> xorg-source-include --> xorg-include > > Hi XSF, > ~ as you might have noticed,

Re: new nv driver that should fix Xv extensions: please test!

2004-09-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> They are up now: > > http://people.no-name-yet.com/~fabbione/nv/powerpc/ > > sorry.. the 2 files are bigger than the others because they haven't be > stripped from the debugging symbols, but they will work as the normal one. This one works fine for me.

Re: new nv driver that should fix Xv extensions: please test!

2004-09-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > Hi everybody, > thanks a lot for all the tests you have been done so far. > > I uploaded again a new nv driver that should fix the Xv extension here: > > http://people.no-name-yet.com/~fabbione/nv/i386/ Do you als

Bug#272496: [radeon] resume fails on iBook2

2004-09-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 When suspending my iBook the resume fails after resuming the sungem ethernet if I had been running X when suspending. Not runing X or downgrading to xserver-xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 from testing

Re: Bug#270228: [nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up

2004-09-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:21:57PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > Package: xserver-xfree86 > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 > > > > When I connect a flatpanel through a DVI cable with my G5 Mac that > > screen is completely garbled. An 'Option "CrtcNumber" "1"' in > > XF84Config the picture a

Bug#270228: [nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up

2004-09-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:50:19AM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:12:14AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > When I connect a flatpanel through a DVI cable with my G5 Mac that > > screen is completely garbled. An 'Option "CrtcNumber" &quo

Bug#270228: [nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up

2004-09-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 When I connect a flatpanel through a DVI cable with my G5 Mac that screen is completely garbled. An 'Option "CrtcNumber" "1"' in XF84Config the picture almost except the last ~1cm on the very right side are displayed on the very left. Replacing nv

Bug#250331: #250331 xserver-xfree86: [wacom] Graphire II doesn't work when Linux 2.6.5 used

2004-08-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
reassign 250331 xserver-xfree86 thanks While this bug is due to a kernel change this change was intentionally and you will need the the new wacom X input driver to get this device work. Thus reassignning to xserver-xfree86 to track merging that driver.

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:34:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Actually it's a (fake-)adb keyboard. But adb already uses the generic > input layer in 2.4 like usb, so it's the same reason. s/keyboard/trackpad/ the former is true aswell, but completely irrelevant for this discussion ;-)

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:36:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, there's people dual-booting into both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. I do > > that myself, although on macs we've used /dev/input/mice in 2.4 already > > anyway. > > Becaue you had a usb keyboard. > > Also, this is one of the reason i

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:29:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > I don't quite like either of those. I'll try to take a look at the > > X Code and/or talk to the X folks on whether we could fix X to autoprobe > > for a corepointer. > > I would rather fix it in the installed XF86Config file, so we

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:43:20PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > The /dev/psaux situation seems to be a big mess. I added /dev/psaux > > upstream long ago so I wouldn't have to change my XF86Config for 2.4 > > vs 2.6. In the meantime X can have two different input devices > > specified and won't

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1347 - in trunk/debian: . patches scripts

2004-05-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:10:03PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > +@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ > + #ifdef _LP64 > + # if defined(__sparcv9) > + # define _MACH64_NAME"sparcv9" > +-# elif defined(__ia64__) > ++# elif defined(__ia64__) || defined(__amd64__) > + # undef MAC

Re: description of fix for #230204 for clean-room reimplmentation

2004-04-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:36:19PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > Around 16 o'clock on Apr 21, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > In the source file > > : > > I'll note that the version of KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok in X.Org CVS does: > > static int > KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok(int rate, int delay) { > #if defined(K

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:02:12PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > So what about the following unutested patch: > > Sorry but i can't accept an untested patch. Would you mind to give it a > shot at least? I don't think I have the time for a full blown X build, sorry.

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:11:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Err, when pasting source code regarding an issue like this, where we > need a clean-room reimplementation, please identify the origin of every > line. The surrounding code is from XFree CVS when I last updated (about two weeks bef

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Okay, I looked over lnx_kbd.c, there's two thing that sprang to my mind: - the ifndef sparc and comment below is obviously wrong, the ioctl is implemented in Linux common code, specifically vt_ioctl.c. - fd 0 for the ioctl seems bogus. These ioctls are on the console device, and to my read

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:17:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Also, if there is a C programmer present who is willing to perform such > a clean-room rewrite should it come to that, please speak up. Please > note that it's just the *change* that needs to be rewritten, not the > entire files.

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 998 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2004-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 06:04:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [...] > * When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon > copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be > copied. What about proper Headers instead of longish pse

Bug#228665: xserver-xfree86: [mouse] SendCoreEvents + ServerLayout entry leads to doubled events

2004-01-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:00:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > That's not what I asked. :) > > I asked if /dev/psaux now also "gives the events of all mice handled by > the input layer, which handles most if not all input in 2.6 kernels." By default /dev/psaux doesn't exist in 2.6 kernels.

Bug#168794: synaptics support in XFree86

2003-09-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:35:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > While 2) is probably not a practical concern with respect to an input > driver, it's very important for things like the shared libraries in the > XFree86 distribution. Hmm, what's the legal situation of having the driver loaded in

Bug#168794: synaptics support in XFree86

2003-09-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:35:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > While 2) is probably not a practical concern with respect to an input > driver, it's very important for things like the shared libraries in the > XFree86 distribution. Hmm, what's the legal situation of having the driver loaded in

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:02:44PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > framebuffer for nvidia cards? (and the framebuffer driver is called > rivafb, just btw..) which doesn't show up in /proc/fb but at least in the 2.6 driver the string nvidia won't appear in it either, just RIV

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Moin Christoph! > Christoph Hellwig schrieb am Wednesday, den 27. August 2003: > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > Package: xserver-xfree86 > > > Severity: wi

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Severity: wishlist > > Okay, here is what I would change in xserver-xfree86.config. > > - xserver-xfree86/config/device/use_fbdev: >check for existance of /proc/fb before asking the question about >

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:02:44PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > framebuffer for nvidia cards? (and the framebuffer driver is called > rivafb, just btw..) which doesn't show up in /proc/fb but at least in the 2.6 driver the string nvidia won't appear in it either, just RIVA-*/GeForce*/etc.. >

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Moin Christoph! > Christoph Hellwig schrieb am Wednesday, den 27. August 2003: > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > Package: xserver-xfree86 > > > Severity: wi

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Severity: wishlist > > Okay, here is what I would change in xserver-xfree86.config. > > - xserver-xfree86/config/device/use_fbdev: >check for existance of /proc/fb before asking the question about >

Re: Running X server chroot?

2003-08-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > (Hmm, maybe you could use tmpfs for /tmp, and mount the same one in both > the real root and the chroot? I've never tried this myself.) Doesn't help as tmpfs instances are compeltly separate. You could mount --bind the real /tmp

Re: Running X server chroot?

2003-08-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > (Hmm, maybe you could use tmpfs for /tmp, and mount the same one in both > the real root and the chroot? I've never tried this myself.) Doesn't help as tmpfs instances are compeltly separate. You could mount --bind the real /tmp

Re: XFree86's HasLinuxInput symbol and m68k

2003-06-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:55:24AM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > No USB on m68k as far as I know (I can hear already the shouts "but there > is this cool USB Adapter for Amiga"), so this should never be executed on > m68k. Maybe not even compiled (I did not read the code too thoroughly). C

Re: XFree86's HasLinuxInput symbol and m68k

2003-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:55:24AM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > No USB on m68k as far as I know (I can hear already the shouts "but there > is this cool USB Adapter for Amiga"), so this should never be executed on > m68k. Maybe not even compiled (I did not read the code too thoroughly). C