Bug#456236: xterm: Missing fullwidth glyphs not handled correctly

2007-12-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:26:01AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > I added a fix to my ongoing changes for #230, here: > > ftp://invisible-island.net/temp/xterm-229h.patch.gz It works perfectly. Thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#456236: xterm: Missing fullwidth glyphs not handled correctly

2007-12-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Package: xterm Version: 229-1 Severity: normal First you'll need my local unicode font to demonstrate this problem: http://www.false.org/~drow/unifont/ Try running this command in an xterm using uni8x16: clear; echo nowhere; tput cup 0 0; perl -e 'print pack ("cc", 0xE9,0x97,0x9c,0xe9,

Bug#410915: xterm 224-1 color problems

2007-03-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:00:21PM +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Package: xterm > > Version: 224-1 > > Followup-For: Bug #410915 > > > > I see a similar intermittent problem in emacs inside s

Bug#410915: xterm 224-1 color problems

2007-03-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Package: xterm Version: 224-1 Followup-For: Bug #410915 I see a similar intermittent problem in emacs inside screen. Sometimes, if I search for a string using C-s that is not present, after the "beep" (screen flash) the name of the current file is redrawn in the wrong background color. It doesn't

Bug#278654: xserver-xfree86: [r128] Problems with existing CCE idle fix

2004-11-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:30:04AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > When I submitted a patch for #236187 and related bugs, I was under the > apparently very bad assumption that

Bug#278654: xserver-xfree86: [r128] Problems with existing CCE idle fix

2004-10-28 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Severity: important Tags: patch When I submitted a patch for #236187 and related bugs, I was under the apparently very bad assumption that the idle would always eventually finish. Three times in the last month I've found X hung but the machine resp

Bug#276090: xterm: Can't paste old selection (buffer 0) to Mozilla

2004-10-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:39:45AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2004-10-11 19:58:08 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > None of the information in that bug log explains _why_ it shouldn't be > > fixed. My reading suggests that it should be, and a determined X coder >

Bug#276090: xterm: Can't paste old selection (buffer 0) to Mozilla

2004-10-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
[Oops, botched the CC line. Sorry.] On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:39:45AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2004-10-11 19:58:08 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > None of the information in that bug log explains _why_ it shouldn't be > > fixed. My reading suggests that

Bug#276090: xterm: Can't paste old selection (buffer 0) to Mozilla

2004-10-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ldn't be fixed. My reading suggests that it should be, and a determined X coder could probably do it. At least for the Debian packages of Mozilla! -- Daniel Jacobowitz

Re: Still having lots of trouble with Alt/Meta keys

2004-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 01:46:53PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > All I want is for my Windows keys to send Meta, and xterm to treat that like > > Escape. This requires XTerm*metaSendsEscape: true. [For some reason, I

Re: Still having lots of trouble with Alt/Meta keys

2004-09-19 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 10:26:52PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 03:00:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > [...] > > Without metaSendsEscape alt-b generates an accented a. I turn on > > altwin:meta_win: > > > > shift Shift_L (0

Still having lots of trouble with Alt/Meta keys

2004-09-19 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
er. Right now I don't care. It's the keyboard cursor movement that I need. This is all terribly confusing, and it's a real shame that we're going to carry it into Sarge, IMO. But most of all I'd like advice on how to make the simple case of using altwin:meta_win work in xterm. All ideas appreciated. -- Daniel Jacobowitz

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-05-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Could something based on this patch, or one of the other suggestions in the bug log, be applied? [Overquoting for history, since this was a while back.] On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:52:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:45:59PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:45:59PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:21:11PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > > Downgrading to xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-16 has eliminated the problem

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:21:11PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > Downgrading to xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-16 has eliminated the problem so > > my money is on the 4.3.0 r128 driver. > > If you agree that yo

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:32:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 18:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > It's probably the 3D driver or the DRM that causes it, not the X s

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:32:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 18:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > It's probably the 3D driver or the DRM that causes it, not the X s

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
, but I've also been sitting at my desk and not letting that evil screensaver get any cycles, so I'll follow up tomorrow. I'm a little disturbed at the stability of the DRI code if it does turn out to be fixed, since that means any user with access to my

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:32:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 18:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > It's probably the 3D driver or the DRM that causes it, not the X s

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 18:13, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:10:38PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > The chip has probably locked up. > > > > It looks that w

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:10:38PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 16:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:31:16PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > I didn't get a backtrace from here; sorry. I killed the X server and > >

Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups

2004-03-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:31:16PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I didn't get a backtrace from here; sorry. I killed the X server and > restarted it. The restart makes this message appear in dmesg repeatedly: (gdb) bt #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x4013ab09 in io

Bug#220814: xfree86_4.2.1-14(unstable/sparc): FTBFS

2004-01-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:12:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > OK, here's what I think is happening. > > > > X is working around a changed type in kd.h by #define rate period. > > A ch

Re: IRC log

2004-01-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
unsigned char rate; /* In characters per > second (0..50).*/ > Nov 14 20:42:58 }; > Nov 14 20:44:17 * elmo wonders why he didn't see that in the grep.. > ah.. helps if you grep in the right chroot > Nov 14 20:44:44ah, that old problem. > Nov 14 20:45:36 so, hmm, which would be the preferred fix? make it > match or remove > Nov 14 20:46:24 or c) leave it to someone who knows what they're > doing.. ;) anyway, work, bbiab > > -- > James > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Is this bug an l-k-h problem?

2004-01-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I'm a bit confused by the bug log. Is this a bug in linux-kernel-headers, and if so, could you give me a testcase for it? Or was it just an incompatibility that X has been updated to work around? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
g the install system with kernel 2.4 on an array > of PowerPC hardware. I didn't suggest changing over, but making them available. I'm not comfortable with the PCI patch, and this is the next best option. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
g the install system with kernel 2.4 on an array > of PowerPC hardware. I didn't suggest changing over, but making them available. I'm not comfortable with the PCI patch, and this is the next best option. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University Mont

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
rather make a set of 2.4 install disks available than include patches like this in our 2.2 kernel. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
;d rather make a set of 2.4 install disks available than include patches like this in our 2.2 kernel. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Roll-your-own X packages

2001-02-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
source package) and a DRI source tree and diff them. Stick the patch in the debian patches directory, and pray it doesn't conflict with any other patches. Bump version in changelog. Rinse, repeat. Dan /--------\ /----\ |

Re: Roll-your-own X packages

2001-02-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
source package) and a DRI source tree and diff them. Stick the patch in the debian patches directory, and pray it doesn't conflict with any other patches. Bump version in changelog. Rinse, repeat. Dan /--------\ /----\ |

Build just a server package

2001-01-14 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Useful if you are doing any kind of local work on the servers... Just run the 'binary-server' target. Saves a lot of compile time. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | |

Build just a server package

2001-01-14 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Useful if you are doing any kind of local work on the servers... Just run the 'binary-server' target. Saves a lot of compile time. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | |

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:17:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Christian T . Steigies wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:28:03PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > Could you try not stripping the modules?

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:17:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Christian T . Steigies wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:28:03PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > Could you try not stripping the modules?

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
lution, since the modules are makeing > trouble right now? Could you try not stripping the modules? I recall alpha having a similar problem. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
lution, since the modules are makeing > trouble right now? Could you try not stripping the modules? I recall alpha having a similar problem. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class

Re: [bruce@perens.com: user not authorized to run the X server]

2000-12-12 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
irst time) it took me a while to find the exact thread which answers it. > You want to do dpkg --reconfigure xfree86-common. That's dpkg-reconfigure, actually... Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|S

Re: [bruce@perens.com: user not authorized to run the X server]

2000-12-12 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
it took me a while to find the exact thread which answers it. > You want to do dpkg --reconfigure xfree86-common. That's dpkg-reconfigure, actually... Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 on PowerPC status update #2

2000-12-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:38:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > The input code is used only for the USB support. If we want to keep > > that, we're going to have to make it build. What I w

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 on PowerPC status update #2

2000-12-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:38:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > The input code is used only for the USB support. If we want to keep > > that, we're going to have to make it build. What I w

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 on PowerPC status update #2

2000-12-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
- both are pretty easy. I can make a patch for this if you want. Dan /--------\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 on PowerPC status update #2

2000-12-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
- both are pretty easy. I can make a patch for this if you want. Dan /--------\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon Unive

Re: XFree 4.0.1-8 won't run on r128/ppc

2000-11-28 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ntially broken. Sorry - just won't work. I aim to have fixed packages in a week or so, but no promises here. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: XFree 4.0.1-8 won't run on r128/ppc

2000-11-28 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ntially broken. Sorry - just won't work. I aim to have fixed packages in a week or so, but no promises here. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I cannot link any more against lib

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I cannot link any more against lib

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ebuilt against woody glibc - right, Branden? Dan /----\ /----\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: xlibs 40.1-0phase2v13 break xawtv

2000-10-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
> Is anyone else having trouble with Xfig? Yep, this isn't fixed yet as far as I can tell. It seems to be a problem in libXt <-> libXaw3d interaction. Dan /\ /----\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class

Re: xlibs 40.1-0phase2v13 break xawtv

2000-10-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
> Is anyone else having trouble with Xfig? Yep, this isn't fixed yet as far as I can tell. It seems to be a problem in libXt <-> libXaw3d interaction. Dan /\ /----\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class

Re: Unidentified subject!

2000-10-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
using. Dexter should not present a "can try again to detect your mouse" dialog if the tool it uses to do so is not there. It does, currently. Confused the heck out of me when it told me I had no mouse. Dan /--------\ /\ | Da

Re: Unidentified subject!

2000-10-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
using. Dexter should not present a "can try again to detect your mouse" dialog if the tool it uses to do so is not there. It does, currently. Confused the heck out of me when it told me I had no mouse. Dan /--------\ /\ | Da

Re: Note about sparc...

2000-10-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
f /* i386Architecture */ #ifdef AlphaArchitecture Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: Note about sparc...

2000-10-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
f /* i386Architecture */ #ifdef AlphaArchitecture Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ation of the X protocol; the root window can not be resized. Dan /--------\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ation of the X protocol; the root window can not be resized. Dan /--------\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University

Re: Phase 2 XFree86 4.0.1 .debs and Qt-2.2.0

2000-09-26 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
the problem, > > but at least the existing Qt-debs for debian-woody > > don't work with XFree-4. This is fixed in the current (-8 I believe) libqt2.2 package. Dan /----\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|

Re: Phase 2 XFree86 4.0.1 .debs and Qt-2.2.0

2000-09-26 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
the problem, > > but at least the existing Qt-debs for debian-woody > > don't work with XFree-4. This is fixed in the current (-8 I believe) libqt2.2 package. Dan /----\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|

Re: XFree 4.0.1 phase2v7 on Powermac 7600/132 /chaos/control

2000-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
#x27;ve got something with the help of the almighty Geert Uytterhueven, I > hope to cook it up and submit it to XFree86 soon, Branden should I CC: you? Cc: debian-x, actually, please. Dan /--------\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|

Re: XFree 4.0.1 phase2v7 on Powermac 7600/132 /chaos/control

2000-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
#x27;ve got something with the help of the almighty Geert Uytterhueven, I > hope to cook it up and submit it to XFree86 soon, Branden should I CC: you? Cc: debian-x, actually, please. Dan /--------\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|

Re: XFree86 4 phase2v5 available for powerpc

2000-09-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
hough it will > make it harder for the users :( Erm... this doesn't make sense to me. On powerpc, if the file does not exist, shouldn't we maintain the old behavior? Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|

Re: XFree86 4 phase2v5 available for powerpc

2000-09-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
although it will > make it harder for the users :( Erm... this doesn't make sense to me. On powerpc, if the file does not exist, shouldn't we maintain the old behavior? Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz

Re: XFree86 4 phase2v5 available for powerpc

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
> as well. I had it working as late as July 18, maybe something broke after > that date. It'll be fine. The problem was in my merge from Ani's code; we're working out a better solution now, and should have something next week. Dan /--------\ /

Re: XFree86 4 phase2v5 available for powerpc

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ed > as well. I had it working as late as July 18, maybe something broke after > that date. It'll be fine. The problem was in my merge from Ani's code; we're working out a better solution now, and should have something next week. Dan /--------\ /

Re: XFree86 4 phase2v5 available for powerpc

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
0 (0x1) IX[B] Hmm, that's wierd, not seen that one before. I'm not inclined to pay any attention to it until we finish fixing the driver, though. Dan /----\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Cl

XFree 4 notes

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: XFree86 4 phase2v5 available for powerpc

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
0 (0x1) IX[B] Hmm, that's wierd, not seen that one before. I'm not inclined to pay any attention to it until we finish fixing the driver, though. Dan /----\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Cl

XFree 4 notes

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/ -- To UNSUBS

Re: Tried X 4 - doesn't work

2000-09-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
fixed shortly, probably in 2v5. Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: Tried X 4 - doesn't work

2000-09-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
fixed shortly, probably in 2v5. Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ppc manifest

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
This one builds packages :) I'm sure there's stuff that still needs fixing, but we have test packages now. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux

more ppc changes

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
/\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

ppc manifest

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
This one builds packages :) I'm sure there's stuff that still needs fixing, but we have test packages now. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux

more ppc changes

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
/\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Clicks when scrolling

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
errupt conflict. What sort of sound card? Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: more ppc patches

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ant for submission upstream; instead the proper solution will be, once the kernel parts of it have been implemented. Meanwhile, if you want the drivers to work at all, you have to use these patches. That's why I consider applying them on only one arch acceptable. Dan /---

more ppc patches

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
everything tremendously easier if we just applied this patch on the one architecture that needs it. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carne

READMEs

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
For those of us who would rather read READMEs about this sort of thing, where the heck ARE they? In the packages? They're sure not on samosa, and the X Strike Force doesn't say anything about 3dfx. Dan /\ /\ |

Re: [andoni@txiringo.dyndns.org: a bug]

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
se applied! I'll look. Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: Clicks when scrolling

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
errupt conflict. What sort of sound card? Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: more ppc patches

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ant for submission upstream; instead the proper solution will be, once the kernel parts of it have been implemented. Meanwhile, if you want the drivers to work at all, you have to use these patches. That's why I consider applying them on only one arch acceptable. Dan /---

more ppc patches

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
everything tremendously easier if we just applied this patch on the one architecture that needs it. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carne

READMEs

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
For those of us who would rather read READMEs about this sort of thing, where the heck ARE they? In the packages? They're sure not on samosa, and the X Strike Force doesn't say anything about 3dfx. Dan /\ /\ |

Re: [andoni@txiringo.dyndns.org: a bug]

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
se applied! I'll look. Dan /\ /--------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XFree86 -configure and bad mouse problem

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
so the strength of our > liberty depends upon the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech > the First Amendment protects." -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/

Re: XFree86 -configure and bad mouse problem

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
so the strength of our > liberty depends upon the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech > the First Amendment protects." -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of &qu

Re: Build error on powerpc

2000-09-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:57:50PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Sorry, all I have is the makedepend line and the gcc line, and it seems to > have done fine... *sigh* I'll try to debug it tomorrow. Dan /\ /----\ |

Build error on powerpc

2000-09-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ment tseng_acl.c:145: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86ReadMmio32Le' makes pointer from integer without a cast tseng_acl.c:145: invalid lvalue in assignment Etc. Looks as if we lost a type somewhere... Dan /----\ /\ |

Re: Build error on powerpc

2000-09-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:57:50PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Sorry, all I have is the makedepend line and the gcc line, and it seems to > have done fine... *sigh* I'll try to debug it tomorrow. Dan /\ /----\ |

Build error on powerpc

2000-09-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
n assignment tseng_acl.c:145: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86ReadMmio32Le' makes pointer from integer without a cast tseng_acl.c:145: invalid lvalue in assignment Etc. Looks as if we lost a type somewhere... Dan /----\ /\ |

Re: XFree86 -configure failure (phase1v19) (4.0.1c)

2000-09-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ages. > This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". > Please reports problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Branden, might want to change this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowi

Re: XFree86 -configure failure (phase1v19) (4.0.1c)

2000-09-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
ages. > This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". > Please reports problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Branden, might want to change this to debian-x@lists ? Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowi

Re: powerpc take 2

2000-08-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:47:59AM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I had to make a couple more changes for powerpc in the current version: > > debian/xlib6g.files.powerpc I removed, and moved the i386 version back to > xlib6g.files. I moved the HasPlugin define in linux.c

Re: powerpc take 2

2000-08-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:47:59AM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I had to make a couple more changes for powerpc in the current version: > > debian/xlib6g.files.powerpc I removed, and moved the i386 version back to > xlib6g.files. I moved the HasPlugin define in linux.c

powerpc take 2

2000-08-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
d, as well as the debian/* diff. I'm rebuilding it now to see if I made any stupid mistakes. Dan /\ /----\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Me

powerpc take 2

2000-08-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
d, as well as the debian/* diff. I'm rebuilding it now to see if I made any stupid mistakes. Dan /\ /----\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Me

Re: rman revisited

2000-08-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
e86 build > process to generate HTML pages from nroff manual pages. Hmm, I think I recall something not debian packaged (maybe a KDE thing?) wanting rman. It could be useful. Is there some other official source for it? Dan /\ /--

Re: rman revisited

2000-08-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
y the XFree86 build > process to generate HTML pages from nroff manual pages. Hmm, I think I recall something not debian packaged (maybe a KDE thing?) wanting rman. It could be useful. Is there some other official source for it? Dan /\ /--

[gewrgiou@imbc.gr: Re: LinuxPPC X Server]

2000-08-02 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
y. - Forwarded message from Kostas Gewrgiou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:17:28 +0300 (EEST) From: Kostas Gewrgiou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: LinuxPPC X Server To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Au

[gewrgiou@imbc.gr: Re: LinuxPPC X Server]

2000-08-02 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
libOSmesa, hopefully. - Forwarded message from Kostas Gewrgiou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:17:28 +0300 (EEST) From: Kostas Gewrgiou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: LinuxPPC X Server To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Au

  1   2   >