Bug#167009: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#167009: Additional details)

2002-10-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2002-10-31 at 03:47, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:18:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Once cannot expect power management-related functionality to work when > > one's kernel doesn't support power management, or when the interfaces to > > the kernel's pow

Bug#167009: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#167009: Additional details)

2002-10-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2002-10-31 at 03:47, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:18:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Once cannot expect power management-related functionality to work when > > one's kernel doesn't support power management, or when the interfaces to > > the kernel's pow

Bug#167009: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#167009: Additional details)

2002-10-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:47:57PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:18:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Once cannot expect power management-related functionality to work when > > one's kernel doesn't support power management, or when the interfaces to > > the

Bug#167009: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#167009: Additional details)

2002-10-30 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:18:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Once cannot expect power management-related functionality to work when > one's kernel doesn't support power management, or when the interfaces to > the kernel's power management support are not set up. One can expect Deb

Bug#167009: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#167009: Additional details)

2002-10-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:47:57PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:18:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Once cannot expect power management-related functionality to work when > > one's kernel doesn't support power management, or when the interfaces to > > the

Bug#167009: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#167009: Additional details)

2002-10-30 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:18:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Once cannot expect power management-related functionality to work when > one's kernel doesn't support power management, or when the interfaces to > the kernel's power management support are not set up. One can expect Deb

Re: Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-10-30 at 15:14, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > As discussed many times on the debian-powerpc list, make sure APM > > emulation is enabled in the kernel, that /dev/apm_bios exists and that > > the X server log contains contain

Re: Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-10-30 at 15:14, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > As discussed many times on the debian-powerpc list, make sure APM > > emulation is enabled in the kernel, that /dev/apm_bios exists and that > > the X server log contains contain

Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-30 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > As discussed many times on the debian-powerpc list, make sure APM > emulation is enabled in the kernel, that /dev/apm_bios exists and that > the X server log contains contains a line I will check on these things and report back late

Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-30 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > As discussed many times on the debian-powerpc list, make sure APM > emulation is enabled in the kernel, that /dev/apm_bios exists and that > the X server log contains contains a line I will check on these things and report back late

Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-10-30 at 05:01, John Goerzen wrote: > > I tried downgrading to 4.2.1-1 (from 4.2.1-3) to see if that would improve > matters. It apparently did not, although after one sleep my mouse alone > remained responsive. > > However, I discovered that the machine was still listening on its a

Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-10-30 at 05:01, John Goerzen wrote: > > I tried downgrading to 4.2.1-1 (from 4.2.1-3) to see if that would improve > matters. It apparently did not, although after one sleep my mouse alone > remained responsive. > > However, I discovered that the machine was still listening on its a

Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-29 Thread John Goerzen
Hello, I tried downgrading to 4.2.1-1 (from 4.2.1-3) to see if that would improve matters. It apparently did not, although after one sleep my mouse alone remained responsive. However, I discovered that the machine was still listening on its airport interface and was able to log in and do some mo

Bug#167009: Additional details

2002-10-29 Thread John Goerzen
Hello, I tried downgrading to 4.2.1-1 (from 4.2.1-3) to see if that would improve matters. It apparently did not, although after one sleep my mouse alone remained responsive. However, I discovered that the machine was still listening on its airport interface and was able to log in and do some mo