Right, it does not make sense to have in debian repository free
applications with enabled xvmc support and disabled (not included)
free xvmc drivers in repository.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
>2014-03-23 21:19 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau :
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 19:03:52 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in
>>> debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See:
>>>
>> Correct, we're probably not going to be en
2014-03-23 21:19 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau :
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 19:03:52 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in
>> debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See:
>>
> Correct, we're probably not going to be enabling xv
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 19:03:52 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in
> debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See:
>
Correct, we're probably not going to be enabling xvmc.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Hello!
It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in
debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/mesa-vdpau-drivers
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705558#24
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi, mesa maintainers,
I've tried to rebuild mesa 10.0.2-1 from experimental with Michal's patch.
I were interested only in VDPAU and after week of testing I can say that it
works fine on my Radeon HD5670. Both mplayer and flashplugin-nonfree use it
and there is no visual glitches with it. CPU load
Source: mesa
Followup-For: Bug #656719
Hello,
Sending the debdiff updated for mesa 10.
Both mesa 9.2.2 and mesa 10 work for vdpau playback on Cedar (radeon).
Thanks
Michal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (171, 'unstable'), (151, '
Package: mesa
Version: 9.1.4
Followup-For: Bug #656719
The dependency on linux-firmware-nonfree should be firmware-linux-nonfree
instead.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Fore
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 23:52 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Paul Menzel (22/06/2012):
> > So the build dependency should be on `llvm-dev` which pulls in `llvm`
> > with `llvm-config` the configure script is looking for.
>
> 13-llvm-config-pick-a-version.diff disagrees.
Interesting. `confi
Paul Menzel (22/06/2012):
> So the build dependency should be on `llvm-dev` which pulls in `llvm`
> with `llvm-config` the configure script is looking for.
13-llvm-config-pick-a-version.diff disagrees.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 23:40 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 22:59:37 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >
> > > Well it looks like LLVM compiler is needed and GCC is not enough.
> > >
> > > $ more conf
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 22:59:37 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> > Well it looks like LLVM compiler is needed and GCC is not enough.
> >
> > $ more configure.ac
> > […]
> > gallium_require_llvm() {
> >
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 22:59:37 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Well it looks like LLVM compiler is needed and GCC is not enough.
>
> $ more configure.ac
> […]
> gallium_require_llvm() {
> if test "x$MESA_LLVM" = x0; then
> case "$host_cpu" in
>
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 14:51 +0200 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On Fre, 2012-06-22 at 14:29 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >
> > $ sudo aptitude install llvm # currently depends on LLVM 3.1
>
> In general, build dependencies are on *-dev packages. The mesa source
> package already build-de
On Fre, 2012-06-22 at 14:29 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> $ sudo aptitude install llvm # currently depends on LLVM 3.1
In general, build dependencies are on *-dev packages. The mesa source
package already build-depends on llvm-2.9-dev on some architectures, is
that not enough?
> 4. Las
forcemerge 656719 677886
quit
Dear Fabio,
thank you very much for that report and your patch. I overlooked your
report and submitted the separate report #677886 [1] and therefore merge
both.
Just as a side note, could you make sure the `Reply-to` and `References`
header fields are set in your m
>> --- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control2012-01-23 13:39:09.471085849
+0100
>> +++ mesa-debian-test/debian//control 2012-01-21 20:29:38.350117156 +0100
>> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ Build-Depends:
>> bison,
>> llvm-2.9-dev [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
>> # libwayland-dev,
>> + xs
On Die, 2012-01-24 at 13:07 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> On 24.01.2012 11:39, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 18:06 +0100, Fabio Pedretti wrote:
> >>> Fabio Pedretti (23/01/2012):
> >>>
> --- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control2012-01-23
> 13:39:09.471085849
On 24.01.2012 11:39, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 18:06 +0100, Fabio Pedretti wrote:
Fabio Pedretti (23/01/2012):
--- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control 2012-01-23 13:39:09.471085849
+0100
+++ mesa-debian-test/debian//control2012-01-21 20:29:38.350117156 +0100
@@
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 18:06 +0100, Fabio Pedretti wrote:
> >Fabio Pedretti (23/01/2012):
> >
> >> --- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control 2012-01-23 13:39:09.471085849
> +0100
> >> +++ mesa-debian-test/debian//control 2012-01-21 20:29:38.350117156
> >> +0100
> >> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ Buil
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 14:49:28 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Fabio Pedretti (23/01/2012):
> > Patch is attached.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Just a quick comment:
>
> > --- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control 2012-01-23 13:39:09.471085849
> > +0100
> > +++ mesa-debian-test/debian//control
>Fabio Pedretti (23/01/2012):
>> Patch is attached.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Just a quick comment:
>
>> --- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control2012-01-23 13:39:09.471085849
+0100
>> +++ mesa-debian-test/debian//control 2012-01-21 20:29:38.350117156 +0100
>> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ Build-Depends:
>> bison,
Fabio Pedretti (23/01/2012):
> Patch is attached.
Thanks.
Just a quick comment:
> --- mesa-debian-originale/debian//control 2012-01-23 13:39:09.471085849
> +0100
> +++ mesa-debian-test/debian//control 2012-01-21 20:29:38.350117156 +0100
> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ Build-Depends:
> bison,
> ll
Patch is attached.
Note:
1) untested since debian-experimental mesa branch doesn't build on my Ubuntu;
2) VDPAU works out of the box supposed you have a recent enough -ati and -
nouveau, i.e. including these commits:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?
id=f6f1b4f7789cfe
Hi,
Fabio Pedretti (21/01/2012):
> Since 8.0 mesa provides xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers.
> In my Ubuntu PPA I added libg3dvl-mesa package to provide these drivers:
> https://launchpad.net/~oibaf/+archive/graphics-drivers/+packages
8.0-rc* packages are being prepared in th
Source: mesa
Severity: wishlist
Since 8.0 mesa provides xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers.
In my Ubuntu PPA I added libg3dvl-mesa package to provide these drivers:
https://launchpad.net/~oibaf/+archive/graphics-drivers/+packages
It would be nice if you can include it directly i
26 matches
Mail list logo
