Bug#749120: [PATCH libFS] include X11/Xmd.h in fs_transport

2015-07-26 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 07/26/15 11:16 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: Xtrans defines BytesReadable_t as int or long depending on whether LONG64 is defined. So on a 64bit build it would be int when building FSConnServ.c, but long for fs_transport.c. To fix this inconsistency, make fs_transport.c include X11/Xmd.h

Bug#749120: [PATCH libFS] include X11/Xmd.h in fs_transport

2015-07-26 Thread Julien Cristau
Xtrans defines BytesReadable_t as int or long depending on whether LONG64 is defined. So on a 64bit build it would be int when building FSConnServ.c, but long for fs_transport.c. To fix this inconsistency, make fs_transport.c include X11/Xmd.h. Debian bug#749120 Reported-by: Michael Tautschnig

Bug#695064: marked as done (conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ in xmd.h)

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:05:10 +0100 with message-id 20121206110510.gr5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#695064: conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ in xmd.h has caused the Debian Bug report #695064, regarding conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL

Bug#695064: conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ in xmd.h

2012-12-05 Thread Jarrett Chisholm
, from src/engine/IceGraphicsEngine.cpp:8: /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h:143:16: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ In file included from src/engine/../linux/../engine/../common/utilities/ImageLoader.h:15:0, from src/engine/../linux/../engine/Texture.h:11

Bug#695064: conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ in xmd.h

2012-12-03 Thread Jarrett Chisholm
: /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h:143:16: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ My guess is the new c++ features has a conflict or something here... If I remove line 143 from Xmd.h, I no longer see this error. Cheers Jarrett PS: the reportbug application crashed (I was using the gtk

Bug#695064: conflicting declaration ‘typedef CARD8 BOOL’ in xmd.h

2012-12-03 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: reassign -1 x11proto-core-dev Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 13:24:55 -0500, Jarrett Chisholm wrote: I'm building a c++ application, which includes xf86vmode.h header. I think this is part of the X11 library header files. Here is the dpkg output: Xmd.h

Processed: reassign 470245 to x11proto-input-dev, retitle 470245 to including Xmd.h in XI.h breaks qt ...

2008-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 # fix at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/inputproto/patch/?id=b5cbe2d93f6c0129b8f29da97778f6d1b15c38f9 reassign 470245 x11proto-input-dev Bug#470245: baghira: FTBFS: Xmd.h

Bug#470245: marked as done (including Xmd.h in XI.h breaks qt)

2008-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:02:09 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#470245: fixed in x11proto-input 1.4.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #470245, regarding including Xmd.h in XI.h breaks qt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 164917 + wontfix Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies Tags were: moreinfo patch upstream Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#164917: marked as done (xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:18:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-16 Thread Warren Turkal
Here is a patch that includes the move toward arch independence and includes a major cleanup of the preprocessor directives in Xmd.h. It converts all #ifdef to #if defined(symbol) and #ifndef to #if !defined(symbol) except for the header test at the top. Warren --- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h

Re: Xmd.h arch dependency

2002-10-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:06:22PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote: There is an arch dependency in Xmd.h, and the diff will hopefully allow progress toward a non-arch dependent version of this file. Please file a bug containing this patch against xlibs-dev so we don't lose track of it. -- G

Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-15 Thread Warren Turkal
of the architecture dependencies in Xmd.h --- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h 2002-10-08 01:05:41.0 -0500 +++ includes/Xmd.h 2002-10-13 22:54:46.0 -0500 @@ -55,9 +55,11 @@ /* * Special per-machine configuration flags. */ -#ifdef CRAY +#if !defined(WORD64) defined(CRAY) #define

Processed: Re: Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 164917 + moreinfo Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-15 Thread Branden Robinson
for most or all of the architecture dependencies in Xmd.h I'm going to hold off on appyling this until I know whether or not upstream thinks it's a good idea. -- G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise -- a Debian GNU/Linux |screaming mob

Re: Xmd.h arch dependency

2002-10-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:06:22PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote: There is an arch dependency in Xmd.h, and the diff will hopefully allow progress toward a non-arch dependent version of this file. Please file a bug containing this patch against xlibs-dev so we don't lose track of it. -- G

Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-15 Thread Warren Turkal
of the architecture dependencies in Xmd.h --- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h 2002-10-08 01:05:41.0 -0500 +++ includes/Xmd.h 2002-10-13 22:54:46.0 -0500 @@ -55,9 +55,11 @@ /* * Special per-machine configuration flags. */ -#ifdef CRAY +#if !defined(WORD64) defined(CRAY) #define

Processed: Re: Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 164917 + moreinfo Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2002-10-15 Thread Branden Robinson
for most or all of the architecture dependencies in Xmd.h I'm going to hold off on appyling this until I know whether or not upstream thinks it's a good idea. -- G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise -- a Debian GNU/Linux |screaming mob

Xmd.h arch dependency

2002-10-14 Thread Warren Turkal
There is an arch dependency in Xmd.h, and the diff will hopefully allow progress toward a non-arch dependent version of this file. Warren --- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h 2002-10-08 01:05:41.0 -0500 +++ includes/Xmd.h 2002-10-13 22:54:46.0 -0500 @@ -55,9 +55,11

Xmd.h

2002-10-14 Thread Warren Turkal
Should X clients include Xmd.h? -- Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc. http://www.golum.org

Xmd.h arch dependency

2002-10-14 Thread Warren Turkal
There is an arch dependency in Xmd.h, and the diff will hopefully allow progress toward a non-arch dependent version of this file. Warren --- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h 2002-10-08 01:05:41.0 -0500 +++ includes/Xmd.h 2002-10-13 22:54:46.0 -0500 @@ -55,9 +55,11

Xmd.h

2002-10-14 Thread Warren Turkal
Should X clients include Xmd.h? -- Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc. http://www.golum.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]