It seems that SPAMCOP goes through cycles. Right now, I have not heard many
complaints lately. But about 4 months ago, I had to lower its weight from
hold to major test.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[Thi
Speaking of SPAMCOP, one option would be to increase the weight that that test
applies. Then you will block mail that fails that test and another, but pass mail
that fails only that test.
YMMV
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338-9234
/sniffer/) trial as well. What declude is
currently passing through sniffer should catch most of.
-Tom
-Original Message-
From: Darrell L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Where I'm At Now and Where S
In my experience SPAMCOP has been very good at weeding out SPAM and we
hold/block using this test alone. We do occasionally get a false
positive or two, but no more or less than any of RBL's that list known
open relays.
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
