www.declude.com
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
From my own experimentation, I'd say that as of today in v2.0.6
DYNHELO is definitely working.
IPU
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Is it available now? Is it working in 2.0.6?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Is it available now? Is it working in 2.0.6?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Probably meant "not avai
5:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Why is IPURL listed as "Currently N/A" ? Not Applicable? To what?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscrib
Why is IPURL listed as "Currently N/A" ? Not Applicable? To what?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=151
Regards,
- Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:35 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Hm -
I looked
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
I noted in in the global.cfg file for 2.06. I believe these tests to be new:
DYNHELO dynhelo x x 7 0
ENCODEDURL encodedurl x x 1 0
IPURL ipurl x x 2 0
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
5 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Hm -
I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't
find any DYNHELO?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
Hm -
I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't
find any DYNHELO?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL
On 12 Apr 2005 at 11:38, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
> I've found the new DYNHELO test to be quite useful and I've
> subsequently stopped using Bud's free external tool (HELOisIP from
> http://bud.thedurlands.com/ ).
Thanks Andrew - [sorry Bud} I will follow your lead and do the same -
-Nick
---
T
Message -
From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Darrell..
The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as
a
combo test but alone with any weight is not somethin
l@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Any feedback on these tests and performance will be appreciated here is
some info on these tests.
BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s for
this E-mail (where X is the fir
ss common names at your organization.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:21 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Hi Darrell:
I have a number
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:07 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Kami,
Excellent point - what would you combo this with?
Darrell
Kami Razvan writes:
> Darrell..
>
> The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it be
Kami,
Excellent point - what would you combo this with?
Darrell
Kami Razvan writes:
Darrell..
The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as a
combo test but alone with any weight is not something I would use. We have
clients that use their outlook and send 50+
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote:
Hi David,
> BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
> This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s
I think Darrell's question was related to optimum sett
Darrell..
The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as a
combo test but alone with any weight is not something I would use. We have
clients that use their outlook and send 50+ people in a single BCC ..
Emails to boards and volunteer groups in nonprofits and politica
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote:
Hi David,
> BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
> This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s
I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather
than functionality.
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declu
Any feedback on these tests and performance will be appreciated here is some
info on these tests.
BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s for this
E-mail (where X is the first test-type-specific piece of information set to
10 in
19 matches
Mail list logo
