Hei,
2007/6/2, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > Having mused upon it for a while since the proposal, I tend to think a
> > > whole release module will be a lot of work for relatively little gain. A
> > > regularly released document showing off stuff "coming down the pipe"
> > > (tube eve
Le dimanche 24 juin 2007 à 18:54 +0300, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've been checking our latest development releases (2.19.x) and
> noticed that some modules haven't had any releases so far in this
> development cycle. Here's a list of some of those modules:
>
> - bug-buddy
> - gedit
>
Hi Benoît,
2007/6/25, Benoît Dejean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le dimanche 24 juin 2007 à 18:54 +0300, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been checking our latest development releases (2.19.x) and
> > noticed that some modules haven't had any releases so far in this
> > development cycle.
On 6/25/07, Benoît Dejean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think gnome-love works, there are many bugs marked HELPWANTED or
> assigned to gnome-love, i've never seen any being solved by someone
> coming out of the blue.
I have. Don't know why the difference exists between our experiences,
but
On 6/25/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/6/25, Benoît Dejean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I've always been around multiload_applet2. gnome-applets is a collection
> > of applets and there are already sub-maintainer. I'd like to
> > commit/work/etc on multiload but my patches are stall
