Re: GNOME 2.19.4 Released!

2007-07-05 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi Elijah, Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS > desktop - http://download.gnome.org/desktop/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS > admin- http://download.gnome.org/admin/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS > bindings - http://download.

Re: GNOME 2.19.4 Released!

2007-07-05 Thread Elijah Newren
On 7/5/07, Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Elijah, > > Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS > > desktop - http://download.gnome.org/desktop/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS > > admin- http://download

Re: GNOME 2.19.4 Released!

2007-07-06 Thread Claude Paroz
> On 7/5/07, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Hi Elijah, > > Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS > > desktop - http://download.gnome.org/desktop/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS >

gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-21 Thread Elijah Newren
Hi, As noted in bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318, there was a recent gtk+ API change. jdahlin just barely told me that the changed API has existed since 1998, long before gtk+-2.11.x (and pointed me to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447214). This API change breaks

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-21 Thread Joseph Sacco
The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. -Joseph = On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 20:05 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi, > > As noted in bug

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Johan Dahlin
Joseph Sacco wrote: > The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would > expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. > I'm ready to adapt but only if the general consent is that API changes are okay. My personal opinion is that the API shouldn't be allowed to change,

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: > Joseph Sacco wrote: > > The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would > > expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. > > > I'm ready to adapt but only if the general consent is that API changes > are okay. >

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Ghee Teo
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: > >> Joseph Sacco wrote: >> >>> The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would >>> expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. >>> >>> >> I'm ready to adapt but o

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 13:58 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: > > Joseph Sacco wrote: > > > The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would > > > expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. > > > > > I'm r

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Owen Taylor
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 15:36 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 13:58 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > > On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: > > > Joseph Sacco wrote: > > > > The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would > > > >