DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22919] New: - cvs does not execute if cvs bin directory in path statement is enclosed in quotes.

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22919. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit taskdef for scriptdef

2003-09-04 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:25 am, Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Is it possible to add '-explain' option to see the real reason why a task cannot be instantiated? Have you run with -debug? Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java

2003-09-04 Thread Jan . Materne
bodewig: could you please also update docs/manual/running.html? will do that What about a -H for -projecthelp??? Sounds more explicit... --DD That´s why I started the discussion before changing the code. I don´t think that that would be useful. Until now -D is the only upper case option. And

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22919] - cvs does not execute if cvs bin directory in path statement is enclosed in quotes.

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22919. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit taskdef for scriptdef

2003-09-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Erik Hatcher wrote: Did you try -debug? On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Is it possible to add '-explain' option to see the real reason why a task cannot be instantiated? - Alexey. better yet, ant -diagnostics to see what tasks are present

Re: .net tasks and mono

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I proose, therefore, that we pull all 'helpful' auto referencing from the ant task because it wasnt needed on windows, and broke mono. Then we can get rid of that extra attribute we hacked in for mono support. +1 Stefan

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit taskdef for scriptd ef

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003, Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw somewhere that Rhino is required for script task, but it actually requires BSF. Wherever you've seen that, Rhino is not required by script. It certainly is required if you want to use JavaScript within that task. I do

cvs commit: ant ReleaseInstructions

2003-09-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/04 00:28:57 Modified:.ReleaseInstructions Log: Some updates, machine name changes, adhere to Apache's beta distribution policy ... Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +12 -15ant/ReleaseInstructions Index: ReleaseInstructions

Re: antcall and build.xml being modified.

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Shatzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When it is run the output is as follows: As long as you are not using an OS like Windows that locks your build file while Ant is running. I figured the output would have been this: antcall is just a thin layer on top of ant, it

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

2003-09-04 Thread Adam Hardy
On 09/03/2003 06:33 PM Gus Heck wrote: As I've been saying all along, lets just introduce a new (unique) notion for attribute/variable expansion (at use time rather than definition time), which is something new in Ant anyhow. No (or less?) backward compatibility issues, and makes it plain and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22930] New: - New update mode in zip (and related) task

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22923] New: - Out-of-date JBuilder information

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22923. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks antcall.html

2003-09-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/04 03:57:33 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks antcall.html Log: Clarify antcall in presence of self-modifying build files. Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +5 -0 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/antcall.html Index: antcall.html

[GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

2003-09-04 Thread Gump Integration Build
/js.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-20030904.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-bsf-20030904.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-classpath-20030904.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-commands-20030904.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-core-20030904.jar:/home

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual ide.html

2003-09-04 Thread conor
conor 2003/09/04 04:16:25 Modified:docs/manual ide.html Log: Update IDE info to include JBuilder PR: 22923 Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +75 -29ant/docs/manual/ide.html Index: ide.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22923] - Out-of-date JBuilder information

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22923. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/xdocs index.xml

2003-09-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/04 04:39:58 Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH ide.html xdocsTag: ANT_15_BRANCH index.xml Log: Merge changes from HEAD to make them appear at the website Revision ChangesPath No revision No

Re: antcall and build.xml being modified.

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to have this documented as undefined. I agree and will change my blurb accordingly. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Manifest.java

2003-09-04 Thread conor
conor 2003/09/04 04:58:02 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Manifest.java Log: Make sure continuations of multi valued attributes (Class-Path) are added to the correct instance PR: 22816 Submitted by: Dan Douglas Revision ChangesPath 1.47

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22923] - Out-of-date JBuilder information

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22923. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22589] - Empty Output to File from Java Task if Java Fails

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22589. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22733] - Mistake When I use build

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntTest.java

2003-09-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/04 04:46:03 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs ant.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java Target.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntTest.java Log:

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks antcall.html

2003-09-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/09/04 04:45:25 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks antcall.html Log: leave it undefined to avoid feature lock-in Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +2 -3 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/antcall.html Index: antcall.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22816] - Continued multiple Class-Path: manifest attributes not parsed

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22816. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22444] - Trailing slash in property location eaten

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22444. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: antcall and build.xml being modified.

2003-09-04 Thread Dominique Devienne
-Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Self-modifying builds are not a practice I would recommend. I actually disagree with that statement somewhat. As long as the self-modification is controlled and static, it's actually a good and powerful way to build

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit taskdef for scriptdef

2003-09-04 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Hello, -diagnostics reported that scriptdef is not available (still without explanation), but I can add taskdef to make it work. Without taskdef there is only a message Could not load class (org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.script.ScriptDef) for type scriptdef. An exception stack trace

RE: antcall and build.xml being modified.

2003-09-04 Thread Shatzer, Larry
-Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: antcall and build.xml being modified. On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Shatzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When it is run the output is as

RE: antcall and build.xml being modified.

2003-09-04 Thread Shatzer, Larry
-Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:45 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: antcall and build.xml being modified. Self-modifying builds are not a practice I would recommend. Let me clarify, the build script I

RE: antcall and build.xml being modified.

2003-09-04 Thread Shatzer, Larry
-Original Message- From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 6:54 AM To: 'Ant Developers List' Subject: RE: antcall and build.xml being modified. I do agree about not locking Ant into forcing reparsing if the build file is changed,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22904] - [Patch] to download some third party libraries (not complete)

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22904. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.