DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26632] - rexec hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34244] - junit.jar required in ANT_HOME\lib directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34244] - junit.jar required in ANT_HOME\lib directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34244] New: - junit.jar required in ANT_HOME\lib directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34241] - tar task fails when fileset contains large file (>=2GB)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks exec.html

jglick 2005/03/30 09:08:27 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant BuildFileTest.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util Watchdog.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTestRunner.java docs

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

jglick 2005/03/30 09:06:40 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java Log: Fixed missing braces. Revision ChangesPath 1.117 +5 -4 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/JUnitTask.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30606] - [PATCH] Ability to specify actual executable for

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java

jglick 2005/03/30 08:59:26 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTasks javadoc.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java Log: Misc. cleanups relating to #30606. Revision ChangesPath 1.799 +4 -4 ant/WHATSNEW

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java

jglick 2005/03/30 08:56:19 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH javadoc.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH Javadoc.java Log: Merge of #30606: 'executab

ResourceCollections

Update: I have been rolling this stuff around and I am nearly ready to have something to show. In general, and as the subject line suggests, I have decided that implementing generic file collections as resource collections may not be too difficult, and could really open a lot of doors. Some high

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34241] New: - tar task fails when fileset contains large file (>=2GB)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33882] - Apt task with fork="false" and factory tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30606] - [PATCH] Ability to specify actual executable for

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [patch] bzip2

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I said before, I saw the big patch on bugzilla and forgot about > this, but as the big patch is no longer valid (breaks bc), here's my > (very) minor version :) Let's see how the revised version of "the big patch" works 8-) Stefan

Re: [patch] Stylebook task javadoc

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > noticed Stylebook was missing @param, This task is so old, I wouldn't even know where to find stylebook ... > renamed m_foo -> foo Uhm, they are protected. I don't think anybody is extending the task, but this is possible (actually,

Re: [patch] oata.taskdefs.email

no patch, Kev. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJarTest.java

Kev Jackson wrote: Here are my current plans -pull the declaration of , tests, etc. -I'd leave the code over in optional, always excluded, with a "here is why this is broken" comment. Its aim is to warn off others. -Not attempt to use jar signing as a way of verifying JAR downloads in ; this was

cvs commit: ant/docs/projects/antlib antlib_classloaders.html antlib_contract.html antlib_descriptors.html antlib_namespaces.html antlib_roadmap.html index.html roles.html

bodewig 2005/03/30 02:09:00 Removed: docs/projects/antlib Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH antlib_classloaders.html antlib_contract.html antlib_descriptors.html antlib_namespaces.html antlib_roadmap.html index.html roles.html Lo

cvs commit: ant/docs/projects/antlib antlib_classloaders.html antlib_contract.html antlib_descriptors.html antlib_namespaces.html antlib_roadmap.html index.html roles.html

bodewig 2005/03/30 02:08:18 Removed: docs/projects/antlib antlib_classloaders.html antlib_contract.html antlib_descriptors.html antlib_namespaces.html antlib_roadmap.html index.html roles.html Log: Remove dead do

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets project.xml

bodewig 2005/03/30 02:03:01 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH bylaws.html cvs.html legal.html license.html mail.html mission.html docs/projects Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH index.html xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH cvs.xml xdocs/

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets project.xml

bodewig 2005/03/30 01:59:36 Modified:xdocs/stylesheets project.xml Removed: docs/projects/antidote design.html index.html module.html news.html docs/projects/antidote/images screenshot.jpg xdocs/projects/antidote design.xml inde

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gump Integration Build wrote: > Xalan? Yes. Currently Gump is broken because the Xalan CVS module contains a file with non-ASCII characters and the Python sync code we use chokes on it. The failures we see come from xml-api's requ

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

yep - since a long long time ... have heard on the gump list that 600+ project should be infected ... (if i remember right) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 30. März 2005 11:44 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets project.xml

bodewig 2005/03/30 01:45:29 Modified:docs cvs.html docs/projects index.html docs/projects/antidote design.html index.html module.html news.html xdocscvs.xml xdocs/projects index.xml

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

Gump Integration Build wrote: To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integ

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJarTest.java

Here are my current plans -pull the declaration of , tests, etc. -I'd leave the code over in optional, always excluded, with a "here is why this is broken" comment. Its aim is to warn off others. -Not attempt to use jar signing as a way of verifying JAR downloads in ; this was my plan. Could you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34231] - options in compilerarg silently overridden by defaults or ignored.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Archiving Antidote

Hi, I've removed write access from the ant-antidote module just to be sure I really pick up the latest version. Could you please have a look at and comment on it (and maybe check my signature 8-)? This is what I envision to become

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJarTest.java

Kev Jackson wrote: Well, a bit of hackery and you can verify that JAR is signed. But there is *nothing* to verify that the signature itself is trusted. Essentially "jarsigner -verify" is a worthless piece of junk from the security perspective. Who'd have thought that a commit message would

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors DateSelectorTest.java DependSelectorTest.java PresentSelectorTest.java

bodewig 2005/03/30 00:35:44 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant IntrospectionHelper.java ProjectHelper.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers CompilerAdapterFactory.java src/main/org/apache/to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24798] - BZip2: faster, less memory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27814] - javadoc task does not encode baskslashes when generating file list by useexternalfile

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26632] - rexec hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTestListenerTest.java

Maybe I'm nit-picking ... On 29 Mar 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +protected void processLine(String line, int level) { > +if (line.startsWith(TESTLISTENER_PREFIX)) > +task.log(line, Project.MSG_VERBOSE); > +else > +su

Re: diff -b

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the way, this kind of diff: > > ...is rather easier to read if you pass -b to cvs diff. True, but then you'd miss if anybody committed tabs instead of spaces 8-) > In principle a semantically important change could be skipped o

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34231] New: - options in compilerarg silently overridden by defaults or ignored.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu