[jira] [Commented] (ARIES-1251) Support jpa 2.0 and 2.1 with the same code base

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14165297#comment-14165297 ] Giuseppe Gerla commented on ARIES-1251: --- done. Please pull my trunk. P.S. now I hav

Re: How about an Aries 'distribution' for Subsystems?

Thanks Guillaume, yes I remember that we discussed about that. I will update to the latest Aries release. Regards JB On 10/09/2014 02:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Fwiw, a few months ago, I've added a subsystem feature to apache 4.x https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/assemblies/feat

Build failed in Jenkins: AriesWithSnapshotDependencies #587

See Changes: [mnuttall] Aries-1260: subsystem.itests dependency on subsystem.core should be moved up -- [...truncated 41313 lines...] Sending artifact delta relative to AriesWithSna

[jira] [Commented] (ARIES-1251) Support jpa 2.0 and 2.1 with the same code base

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14165178#comment-14165178 ] Christian Schneider commented on ARIES-1251: I have been able to checkout you

[jira] [Created] (ARIES-1260) subsysten.itests dependency on subsystem.core should be moved up

Mark Nuttall created ARIES-1260: --- Summary: subsysten.itests dependency on subsystem.core should be moved up Key: ARIES-1260 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1260 Project: Aries

[jira] [Updated] (ARIES-1260) subsystem.itests dependency on subsystem.core should be moved up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Nuttall updated ARIES-1260: Summary: subsystem.itests dependency on subsystem.core should be moved up (was: subsysten.itests de

[jira] [Commented] (ARIES-1251) Support jpa 2.0 and 2.1 with the same code base

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14165138#comment-14165138 ] Giuseppe Gerla commented on ARIES-1251: --- Hi Christian are you able to download my c

Re: How about an Aries 'distribution' for Subsystems?

Yes, Karaf is certainly a solution to the problem and it's great that it supports subsystems today. What I'm proposing is simply an alternative. A 'minimalist' approach. Just Felix+Aries subsystems and nothing else. I'm finding that there are people interested in something like that. David On 9 O

Re: How about an Aries 'distribution' for Subsystems?

Fwiw, a few months ago, I've added a subsystem feature to apache 4.x https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/assemblies/features/enterprise/src/main/feature/feature.xml It may need to be updated to the latest aries release though ... 2014-10-09 14:03 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi Dav

Re: How about an Aries 'distribution' for Subsystems?

Hi David, what about having a distribution based on Karaf for that ? I mean, what you installed is likely already provided by Karaf minimal distro (4.0.0). I discussed with Christian last week to add features/subsystem relationship and being able to support both. Up to now, Aries is a frame

How about an Aries 'distribution' for Subsystems?

Hi all, Now that all there are no snapshot dependencies any more for using Aries Subsystems with the OSGi Repository I was thinking about what would be an easy way for people to get started with them... While subsystems files themselves make it easy for people to deploy their apps, they would sti

[jira] [Commented] (ARIES-1247) EntityManagerFactoryManager: remove the try of creation of EntityManagerFactories from Bundle.RESOLVED event

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14164858#comment-14164858 ] Christian Schneider commented on ARIES-1247: Not sure what you refer to. The a