[GitHub] bigtop issue #188: BIGTOP-2706 Apex package does not run successfully after ...

2017-03-23 Thread chinmaykolhatkar
Github user chinmaykolhatkar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/188 @c0s @rvs @tweise Made the changes. I had to add a diff for apex to compile successfully with 2.7.x. The reason for the patch is captured here for reference: APEXCORE-679 In futu

[GitHub] bigtop pull request #188: BIGTOP-2706 Apex package does not run successfully...

2017-03-23 Thread chinmaykolhatkar
Github user chinmaykolhatkar commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/188#discussion_r107836097 --- Diff: bigtop-packages/src/common/apex/do-component-build --- @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ command -v mvn > /dev/null 2>&1 || { # Build apex mvn cl

[GitHub] bigtop pull request #189: BIGTOP-2712: Juju CI driven updates

2017-03-23 Thread kwmonroe
GitHub user kwmonroe opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/189 BIGTOP-2712: Juju CI driven updates The original point of this branch was to refresh the hbase charm (readme was out-of-date, needed lint love). However, as soon as ran CI on this and recent chan

Re: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Ganesh Raju
Here is the link for 1.8.0_111 https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/security/+build/11087717 Thanks, Ganesh On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > >> > >> So for the incoming 1.2.0 release, to fix this on aarch64/ubuntu-16.04 I > >> see two ways: > >> 1. Downgrade ope

Releasing 1.2 for non-x86 architectures

2017-03-23 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! recent issues surrounding builds on two of our two non-x86 platforms got me thinking that while it is fun to build on them (to iron out kinds in JDK and what not) we don't actually have to release the packages for most of the projects since all those are arch independent. The only ones that AR

Re: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Olaf Flebbe
> Am 23.03.2017 um 21:33 schrieb Roman Shaposhnik : > > There's no 111 :-( Yep, ubuntu seems to have replaced all 111 packages by 121. And yes, our current docker image still has 111. My-o-my. Guess going back is no option, at least not without compiling java ourself or grabbing it from a dubi

Re: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
There's no 111 :-( Jun, Naresh, Ganesh, out of the list available on the URL Olaf provided -- what should we pick? Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: >>> >>> So for the incoming 1.2.0 release, to fix this on aarch64/ubuntu-16.04 I >>> see two ways: >>> 1. Downgra

Re: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Olaf Flebbe
>> >> So for the incoming 1.2.0 release, to fix this on aarch64/ubuntu-16.04 I >> see two ways: >> 1. Downgrade open-jdk to 1.8.0_111. This needs to change bigtop_toolchain/ >> manifests/jdk.pp > > I'd vote for this option. But I've got to ask: where do I get that exact > version > for ubuntu 16

Re: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Ganesh Raju wrote: > Forwarding to dev mailing list. Any thoughts ? > > Thanks > Ganesh Raju > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Jun He > Date: Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:10 AM > Subject: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes > To: Roman Shap

[GitHub] bigtop pull request #188: BIGTOP-2706 Apex package does not run successfully...

2017-03-23 Thread c0s
Github user c0s commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/188#discussion_r107769130 --- Diff: bigtop-packages/src/common/apex/do-component-build --- @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ command -v mvn > /dev/null 2>&1 || { # Build apex mvn clean package -

Re: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
With any luck we are going to upgrade to Ignite 1.9 which has this issue fixed. -- Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any compan

Fwd: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes

2017-03-23 Thread Ganesh Raju
Forwarding to dev mailing list. Any thoughts ? Thanks Ganesh Raju -- Forwarded message -- From: Jun He Date: Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:10 AM Subject: Build failed due to OpenJDK 1.8.0_121 changes To: Roman Shaposhnik , Ganesh Raju Cc: Naresh Bhat , Eugene Xie , Tone Zhang , Yuqi G