Le 6 janv. 06, à 04:55, Antonio Gallardo a écrit :
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
...although copy in SVN is very cheap, I am finding this "CVS
practice" less important, since all commits are atomic and good
commit messages can be reviewed and identifying when things happen.
But maybe just me.
+1
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 06 January 2006 02:26, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Tag the trunk before you start, and then again afterwards.
Tag == copy == backup, so it may sound a bit contradictory to Jorg.
And although copy in SVN is very cheap, I am finding this "CVS practice" less
i
On Friday 06 January 2006 02:26, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Tag the trunk before you start, and then again afterwards.
Tag == copy == backup, so it may sound a bit contradictory to Jorg.
And although copy in SVN is very cheap, I am finding this "CVS practice" less
important, since all commits are a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:14:19 +0100
From: Jorg Heymans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] preliminary wrap-up
OK, so unless someone vetoe
Jorg Heymans wrote:
OK, so unless someone vetoes this the next few hours i will start
shifting files about around 11pm CET today.
It would be great if people could refrain from checking stuff into
trunk/core from then onwards until i've finished. It will take a good
few hours, i'll notify when
Jorg Heymans wrote:
OK, so unless someone vetoes this the next few hours i will start
shifting files about around 11pm CET today.
It would be great if people could refrain from checking stuff into
trunk/core from then onwards until i've finished. It will take a good
few hours, i'll notify when i
OK, so unless someone vetoes this the next few hours i will start
shifting files about around 11pm CET today.
It would be great if people could refrain from checking stuff into
trunk/core from then onwards until i've finished. It will take a good
few hours, i'll notify when it is done.
also : sh
